A DDL Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Proietti and Olsson (2013) show how a state of pluralistic ignorance may be dissolved by a series of announcements of private beliefs heard by matrix neighbors.
“Of formal studies, Proietti and Olsson (2013) show how a state of pluralistic ignorance state may be dissolved by a series of announcements of private beliefs heard by matrix neighbors.”
From Pluralistic ignorance in the bystander effect: informational dynamics of unresponsive witnesses in situations calling for intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Proietti and Olsson (2013)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rendsvig, R. K. (2014) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0435-0 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Proietti, C., & Olsson, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Proietti, Carlo
- Venue
- Journal of Philosophical Logic
- Published
- 2013-03-21
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 499-515
- ISSN
- 0022-3611 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0433
- OpenAlex
- W2008582606
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Philosophical Logic (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- pluralistic ignorance, collective beliefs, shared beliefs, announcements, group belief
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
