CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSocial Media in Health EducationMobile Learning in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of Text Messaging for Maternal and Infant Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Poorman, Elisabeth, Gazmararian, Julie, Parker, Ruth M., Yang, Baiyu, Elon, Lisa·2015·Maternal and Child Health Journal
DOI 10.1007/s10995-014-1595-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Text messaging is an increasingly popular communication tool in health interventions, but has been little studied in maternal and infant health. This literature review evaluates studies of text messaging that may be applied to the promotion of maternal and infant health. Articles from peer-reviewed journals published before June 2012 were included if they were experimental or quasi-experimental studies of behaviors endorsed either by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American Pediatrics Association, or the United States Preventive Services Task Force; included reproductive age women (12-50 years) or infants up to 2 years of age; and were available in English. Qualitative studies of text messaging specific to pregnant women were also included. Studies were compared and contrasted by key variables, including: design, time-period, study population, and results. Forty-eight articles were included, 30 of which were randomized controlled trials. Interventions vary greatly in effectiveness and soundness of methodology, but collectively indicate that there is a wide range of preventative behaviors that text message interventions can effectively promote, including smoking cessation, diabetes control, appointment reminders, medication adherence, weight loss, and vaccine uptake. Common methodological issues include not accounting for attention affect and not aligning text message content to measured outcomes. Those interventions that are based on an established theory of behavior change and use motivational as opposed to informational language are more likely to be successful. Building on the growing body of evidence for text message interventions reviewed here, as well as the growing popularity of text messaging as a medium, researchers should be able to use this technology to engage difficult to reach populations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-014-1595-8

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Smith, A. (2011). Americans and text messaging (pp. 1–14). Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.
  2. Johnson, K., Posner, S., Biermann, J., et al. (2006). Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care. Washington, D.C.: Centers for Disease Control.
  3. Naughton, F. (2012). Randomized controlled trial evaluation of a tailored leaflet and SMS text message self-help intervention for pregnant smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14(5), 569–577. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Poorman, E., Gazmararian, J., Parker, R. M., Yang, B., & Elon, L.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Poorman, Elisabeth
ORCID
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-08-01
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
969-989
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
DOI
10.1007/s10995-014-1595-8
OpenAlex
W2074855985
Cited by
116
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
text messaging, maternal health, infant health, mobile health intervention, smoking cessation, diabetes management, appointment reminders, medication adherence, weight loss, vaccine uptake, behavior change, motivational language, pregnant women, hard-to-reach populations
MeSH terms
Maternal Health, Infant Health, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Societies, Medical, Health Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Women's Health, Reminder Systems, Young Adult, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review