Cited by 7Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Nutrition and HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

An Evaluation of a Perinatal Education and Support Program to Increase Breastfeeding in a Chinese American Community

Lau, Jennifer D., Zhu, Yajie, Vora, Shalini·2021·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

Introduction In 2015, a community health center implemented a multipronged, Chinese language, health education initiative to increase breastfeeding. Perinatal education, hospital visits after delivery, and postpartum support were implemented to provide informational and emotional support. This study evaluates the impact of the breastfeeding program for Chinese American women. Methods This is a quasi-experimental study to assess the change in any and exclusive breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks postpartum. A difference-in-differences regression analysis was used to determine change in breastfeeding attributable to the program at an intervention site after adjusting for change in a control site during the same period. Change in breastfeeding was also examined by sociodemographic characteristics. Results A total of 1475 women who received perinatal care at two community center sites in 2014 and 2016 were included in the study. Within the women who received the intervention, any breastfeeding increased by 24 percentage points to 71% and exclusive breastfeeding increased by 13 percentage points to 27%. After adjusting for the change in the control group during the same period, the increases in any and exclusive breastfeeding attributable to the program were 17 (p Conclusions A bilingual and bicultural breastfeeding program incorporated into routine pregnancy care at an intervention site experienced increases in both any and exclusive breastfeeding, even after adjusting for changes in brea…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-020-03016-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 20 · Cited by 7

Authors
Lau, J. D., Zhu, Y., & Vora, S.
Affiliations
Center for Inherited Blood Disorders (US)
Corresponding author
Lau, Jennifer D.
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2020-11-16
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
214-220
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W3101196647
Cited by
7
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
W.K. Kellogg Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
breastfeeding promotion, exclusive breastfeeding, Chinese American women, perinatal education, postpartum support, bilingual health education, community health centers, language barriers, Medicaid, primiparous women, New York City
MeSH terms
Adult, Asian, Breast Feeding, Community Health Centers, Counseling, Female, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Mothers, New York City, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Program Evaluation, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review