Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computational screening of umami tastants using deep learning

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Umami, a fundamental human taste modality, refers to the savory flavors in meats and broths, often associated with monosodium glutamate and protein richness. With limited knowledge of umami molecules, the food industry seeks efficient approaches for identifying novel tastants. In this study, we have devised a virtual screening pipeline for identifying highly potent umami tastants from large molecular databases. We curated the most extensive classification dataset containing 439 umami and 428 non-umami molecules and trained a transformer-based architecture to differentiate between the two classes, achieving 93% accuracy. Additionally, we built a neural network model for predicting the potency of umami compounds, the first effort of its kind. The classification and potency prediction models were combined with similarity analysis and toxicity screening to build an end-to-end virtual framework for the rational discovery of novel tastants. We applied this framework to the FooDB database containing around 70,000 molecules as an illustrative use case for screening potent umami compounds. The screened molecules were validated using molecular docking with the umami taste receptor. This study demonstrates the potential of data-driven methods in discovering new tastants from structural and chemical features of molecules and proposes an efficient implementation for industrial applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11030-024-11006-4

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, "A unified approach to interpreting model predicitions," in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.

Metadata

Authors
Dutta, P., Gajula, K., Verma, N., Jain, D., Gupta, R., & Rai, B.
Affiliations
Tata Consultancy Services (India) (IN)
Corresponding author
Gupta, Rakesh
Venue
Molecular Diversity
Published
2024-10-18
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
2979-2993
ISSN
  • 1381-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-501X
OpenAlex
W4403541777
Cited by
6
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Molecular Diversity (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tata Consultancy Services
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
umami taste, virtual screening, deep learning, transformer-based classification, potency prediction, similarity analysis, toxicity screening, umami taste receptor, molecular docking, monosodium glutamate
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Flavoring Agents, Humans, Taste, Neural Networks, Computer, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational screening of umami tastants using deep learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11030-024-11006-4
The paper
Dutta, P., Gajula, K., Verma, N., Jain, D., Gupta, R., & Rai, B. (2025). Computational screening of umami tastants using deep learning. Molecular Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-024-11006-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.