An experience sampling study of the momentary dynamics of moral, autonomous, competent, and related need satisfactions, moral enactments, and psychological thriving
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Moral satisfaction is related to the enactment of moral behaviors and to wellness at both between- and within-person levels of analysis.
“In their contribution to the special issue, they provided further evidence by showing that moral satisfaction is related to the enactment of moral behaviors and to wellness at both between-and within-person levels of analysis, thereby satisfying Basic Criterion #5.”
From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Prentice et al. 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Prentice, M., Jayawickreme, E., & Fleeson, W.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Prentice, Mike
- Venue
- Motivation and Emotion
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244-256
- ISSN
- 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6644
- OpenAlex
- W3015620625
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Templeton Religion Trust (TRT0096)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- basic psychological needs, self-determination theory, moral behavior, moral character, autonomy, competence, relatedness, everyday life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
