Cited by 10Congenital heart defects researchTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineMesenchymal stem cell research

Myocardial regeneration: Role of epicardium and implicated genes

Saifi, Omran, Ghandour, Bachir, Jaalouk, Diana, Refaat, Marwan, Mahfouz, Rami·2019·Molecular Biology Reports

Abstract

Lower invertebrates' hearts such as those of zebrafish have the capacity for scarless myocardial regeneration which is lost by mammalian hearts as they form a fibrotic scar tissue instead of regenerating the injured area. However, neonatal mammalian hearts have a remarkable capacity for regeneration highlighting conserved evolutionary mechanisms underlying such a process. Studies investigated the underlying mechanism of myocardial regeneration in species capable to do so, to see its applicability on mammals. The epicardium, the mesothelial outer layer of the vertebrate heart, has proven to play an important role in the process of repair and regeneration. It serves as an important source of smooth muscle cells, cardiac fibroblasts, endothelial cells, stem cells, and signaling molecules that are involved in this process. Here we review the role of the epicardium in myocardial regeneration focusing on the different involved; Activation, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and differentiation. In addition, we will discuss its contributory role to different aspects that support myocardial regeneration. Of these we will discuss angiogenesis and the formation of a regenerate extracellular matrix. Moreover, we will discuss several factors that act on the epicardium to affect regeneration. Finally, we will highlight the utility of the epicardium as a mode of cell therapy in the treatment of myocardial injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11033-019-05075-0

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saifi, O., Ghandour, B., Jaalouk, D., Refaat, M., & Mahfouz, R.
Affiliations
  • American University of Beirut (LB)
  • American University of Beirut Medical Center (LB)
Corresponding author
Mahfouz, Rami
Venue
Molecular Biology Reports
Published
2019-09-23
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
6661-6674
ISSN
  • 0301-4851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4978
OpenAlex
W2976782203
Cited by
10
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Biology Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
Keywords
cardiac regeneration, epicardium, zebrafish heart, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, extracellular matrix, cardiac repair
MeSH terms
Animals, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Mammals, Pericardium, Regeneration, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review