Cited by 30Nanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generation of peptides using phage display technology for cancer diagnosis and molecular imaging

Open access
Pung, Hai Shin, Tye, Gee Jun, Leow, Chiuan Herng, Ng, Woei Kean, Lai, Ngit Shin·2023·Molecular Biology Reports

Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide; nearly 10 million people died from it in 2020. The high mortality rate results from the lack of effective screening approaches where early detection cannot be achieved, reducing the chance of early intervention to prevent cancer development. Non-invasive and deep-tissue imaging is useful in cancer diagnosis, contributing to a visual presentation of anatomy and physiology in a rapid and safe manner. Its sensitivity and specificity can be enhanced with the application of targeting ligands with the conjugation of imaging probes. Phage display is a powerful technology to identify antibody- or peptide-based ligands with effective binding specificity against their target receptor. Tumour-targeting peptides exhibit promising results in molecular imaging, but the application is limited to animals only. Modern nanotechnology facilitates the combination of peptides with various nanoparticles due to their superior characteristics, rendering novel strategies in designing more potent imaging probes for cancer diagnosis and targeting therapy. In the end, a myriad of peptide candidates that aimed for different cancers diagnosis and imaging in various forms of research were reviewed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11033-023-08380-x

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Pung, H. S., Tye, G. J., Leow, C. H., Ng, W. K., & Lai, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • AIMST University (MY)
Corresponding author
Lai, Ngit Shin
Venue
Molecular Biology Reports
Published
2023-04-04
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
4653-4664
ISSN
  • 0301-4851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4978
OpenAlex
W4362523162
Cited by
30
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HiCoE (311/CIPPM/44001005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
phage display, cancer diagnosis, molecular imaging, imaging agents, targeting ligands, peptide-nanoparticle conjugates, early cancer detection, deep tissue imaging
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteriophages, Neoplasms, Peptides, Technology, Peptide Library, Molecular Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review