Cited by 57Innovation in Digital Healthcare SystemsContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Ontology driven interactive healthcare with wearable sensors

Kim, Jonghun, Kim, Jaekwon, Lee, Daesung, Chung, Kyung-Yong·2014·Multimedia Tools and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11042-012-1195-9

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kim, J., Kim, J., Lee, D., & Chung, K.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Inha University (KR)
  • Catholic University of Pusan (KR)
Venue
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Published
2012-09-04
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
827-841
ISSN
  • 1380-7501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7721
OpenAlex
W2037928833
Cited by
57
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Multimedia Tools and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
wearable sensors, ubiquitous healthcare, context-aware services, inference rules, stretchable materials, user satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review