Assessing the quality of experience in viewing rendered decompressed light fields
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A metric for quality evaluation of the rendered views that measures the variation of structural similarity on a set of viewpoints extracted from the light field is proposed.
“A metric for quality evaluation of the rendered views that measures the variation of structural similarity on a set of viewpoints extracted from the light field is proposed [341].”
From QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [341]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey
Barakabitze, A. A., Barman, N., Ahmad, A., Zadtootaghaj, S., Sun, L., Martini, M. G., & Atzori, L. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2958784 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
- Authors
- Perra, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Perra, Cristian
- ORCID
- Perra, Cristian
- Venue
- Multimedia Tools and Applications
- Published
- 2018-01-17
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 21771-21790
- ISSN
- 1380-7501 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7721
- OpenAlex
- W2785851360
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Multimedia Tools and Applications (publishedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
- European Regional Development Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
- Keywords
- light field imaging, quality of experience, light field compression, structural similarity, objective quality metrics, subjective quality assessment, viewpoint variation, image quality assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
