Cited by 104AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Deep learning approaches to detect breast cancer: a comprehensive review

Sharafaddini, Amir Mohammad, Esfahani, Kiana Kouhpah, Mansouri, Najme·2024·Multimedia Tools and Applications

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11042-024-20011-6This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 138 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, N. S. Wagle, A. Jemal, Cancer statistics, 2023, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 73, 17–48, (2023).
  2. Han Z, Wei B, Zheng Y, Yin Y, Li K, Li S (2017) Breast cancer multi-classification from histopathological images with structured deep learning model. Sci Rep 7:1–10
  3. Ng EYK, Ung LN, Ng FC, Sim LSJ (2001) Statistical analysis of healthy and malignant breast thermography. J Med Eng 25:253–263
  4. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 25
  5. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/534133 · DOI
  6. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer WP (2001) The digital database for screening mammography. In: Yaffe MJ (ed) Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on digital mammography. Medical Physics Publishing, pp 212–218
  7. Farahmand S, Fernandez AI, Ahmed FS, Rimm DL, Chuang JH, Reisenbichler E, Zarringhalam K (2022) Deep learning of longitudinal mammogram examinations for breast cancer risk prediction. Pattern Recogn 132:108919 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sharafaddini, A. M., Esfahani, K. K., & Mansouri, N.
Affiliations
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (IR)
Corresponding author
Mansouri, Najme
Venue
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Published
2024-08-20
Volume
84
Issue
21
Pages
24079-24190
ISSN
  • 1380-7501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7721
OpenAlex
W4401978246
Cited by
104
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 6
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed
Locations
Multimedia Tools and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
breast cancer detection, breast cancer diagnosis, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRI, histopathology, infrared thermography, microcalcification detection, tumor localization, class imbalance, data augmentation, transfer learning, multimodal data integration, model interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review