PreprintCited by 17,072Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and Data Classification

EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks

Open access
Tan, Mingxing, Le, Quoc V.·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets) are commonly developed at a fixed resource budget, and then scaled up for better accuracy if more resources are available. In this paper, we systematically study model scaling and identify that carefully balancing network depth, width, and resolution can lead to better performance. Based on this observation, we propose a new scaling method that uniformly scales all dimensions of depth/width/resolution using a simple yet highly effective compound coefficient. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method on scaling up MobileNets and ResNet. To go even further, we use neural architecture search to design a new baseline network and scale it up to obtain a family of models, called EfficientNets, which achieve much better accuracy and efficiency than previous ConvNets. In particular, our EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, while being 8.4x smaller and 6.1x faster on inference than the best existing ConvNet. Our EfficientNets also transfer well and achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on CIFAR-100 (91.7%), Flowers (98.8%), and 3 other transfer learning datasets, with an order of magnitude fewer parameters. Source code is at https://github.com/tensorflow/tpu/tree/master/models/official/efficientnet.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The YOLO family, MobileNet and its derivative-based backbones, and EfficientNet-Lite backbones are very suitable for deployment with a lower number of parameters while retaining higher performance.

    “In general, the analyses show that the YOLO family [52,71,104,112] of network architectures and MobileNet and its derivative-based [40,53] and EfficientNet-Lite [56] backbones are very suitable for deployment with a lower number of parameters while retaining higher performance.”

    From A survey on deep learning-based monocular spacecraft pose estimation: Current state, limitations and prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [56]

    Section 5.2 (p. 7) reports that EfficientNet models achieve similar or better accuracy with fewer parameters and FLOPS, and measures faster inference on a CPU. But the cited paper discusses EfficientNet-B0 through B7, not EfficientNet-Lite backbones, so it does not establish the deployment claim for the specifically cited variant. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • EfficientNets achieve state-of-the-art accuracy while being an order-of-magnitude smaller and faster than previous models.

    “EfficientNets [37] are a family of image classification models, which achieve state-of-the-art accuracy, yet being an order-ofmagnitude smaller and faster than previous models.”

    From Improving Generalization of Deepfake Detection With Data Farming and Few-Shot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction (p. 1) reports state-of-the-art ImageNet accuracy for EfficientNet-B7 and says it is 8.4× smaller and 6.1× faster than GPipe. Section 5.2 (p. 7) describes generally order-of-magnitude reductions in parameters and FLOPs, but its measured inference-speed comparisons are 5.7× and 6.1×—not an order of magnitude faster. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • EfficientNet is a family of deep learning models that are scaled to balance network depth, width, and input data resolution to achieve an optimal performance-training time trade-off.

    “EfficientNet is a family of DL models that are scaled to balance network depth, width, and input data resolution to achieve an optimal performance-training time trade-off.”

    From Benchmarking and scaling of deep learning models for land cover image classification (2023) · cites this paper as Tan and Le, 2019

    The Introduction (p. 2) identifies EfficientNets as a family of scaled models, and Compound Scaling (p. 4) says balancing depth, width, and resolution improves accuracy and efficiency. But the paper assesses the trade-off using accuracy, FLOPs, and inference latency—not training time—and does not establish an optimal performance–training-time trade-off. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Layers in residual networks exhibit a large amount of redundancy, and almost any individual layer can be removed after training without hurting performance.

    “Previous works [50, 15] have shown that layers in residual networks exhibit a large amount of redundancy, and that almost any individual layer can be removed after training without hurting performance.”

    From Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classification (2021) · cites this paper as [50]

    Section 3.2 (p. 3) says ResNet-1000 has similar accuracy to ResNet-101 despite having many more layers, supporting the narrower point that gains from added depth diminish. It does not show that almost any individual layer can be removed after training without hurting performance. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In top-5 winning solutions of DFDC, all were image-based detection methods; three used EfficientNet as backbone.

    “In the top-5 winning solutions of DFDC, all of them were image-based detection methods. Three of the five methods used EfficientNet (Tan and Le 2019) as the backbone model.”

    From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Tan and Le 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Han, S., Mao, H., and Dally, W. J. Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding. ICLR , 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946948417
Cited by
17,072
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 193 · 2025: 2341 · 2024: 3966 · 2023: 3735 · 2022: 2876 · 2021: 2753 · 2020: 1075 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
EfficientNet, model scaling, convolutional neural networks, compound scaling, MobileNet, ResNet, neural architecture search, transfer learning, ImageNet, model efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review