The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials
Open accessAbstract
Various stakeholders are increasingly interested in the potential toxicity and other risks associated with nanomaterials throughout the different stages of a product’s life cycle (e.g., development, production, use, disposal). Risk assessment methods and tools developed and applied to chemical and biological materials may not be readily adaptable for nanomaterials because of the current uncertainty in identifying the relevant physico-chemical and biological properties that adequately describe the materials. Such uncertainty is further driven by the substantial variations in the properties of the original material due to variable manufacturing processes employed in nanomaterial production. To guide scientists and engineers in nanomaterial research and application as well as to promote the safe handling and use of these materials, we propose a decision support system for classifying nanomaterials into different risk categories. The classification system is based on a set of performance metrics that measure both the toxicity and physico-chemical characteristics of the original materials, as well as the expected environmental impacts through the product life cycle. Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA-TRI), a formal decision analysis method, was used as the foundation for this task. This method allowed us to cluster various nanomaterials in different ecological risk categories based on our current knowledge of nanomaterial physico-chemical characteristics, variation in produced material, and best professional judgments. SMAA-TRI uses Monte Carlo simulations to explore all feasible values for weights, criteria measurements, and other model parameters to assess the robustness of nanomaterial grouping for risk management purposes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods
Tervonen, T., & Figueira, J. R. (2008) · Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis · doi:10.1002/mcda.407 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Cited by
Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations
Jeevanandam, J., Barhoum, A., Chan, Y. S., Dufresne, A., & Danquah, M. K. (2018) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.98 · Cited by 3,297
ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications
Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019 · Cited by 598
An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions
Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013) · Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis · doi:10.1002/mcda.1482 · Cited by 396
Self-citationNanomaterials in food and agriculture: An overview on their safety concerns and regulatory issues
Jain, A., Ranjan, S., Dasgupta, N., & Ramalingam, C. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2016.1160363 · Cited by 367
Toxicity and regulations of food nanomaterials
Ranjan, S., Dasgupta, N., Singh, S., & Gandhi, M. (2019) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-018-00851-z · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Tervonen, T., Linkov, I., Figueira, J. R., Steevens, J., Chappell, M., & Merad, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Nanoparticle Research
- Published
- 2008-11-15
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 757-766
- ISSN
- 1388-0764 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2153844386
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11051-008-9546-1
- The paper
- Tervonen, T., Linkov, I., Figueira, J. R., Steevens, J., Chappell, M., & Merad, M. (2009). Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9546-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.