The DOI matches its Crossref record; 177 of the 177 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys
Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrogott, M. (2005) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/b100605 · Cited by 4,491
Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 · Cited by 3,800
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2001) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,724
A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications
Behzadian, M., Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 · Cited by 2,690
Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000) · Applied Optimization · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6 · Cited by 2,394
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,346
GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature
Malczewski, J. (2006) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658810600661508 · Cited by 2,289
Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future
Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., & Kannan, D. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012 · Cited by 1,963
Self-citationApplication of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review
Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007 · Cited by 1,938
The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods
Roy, B. (1991) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/bf00134132 · Cited by 1,865
Cited by
Learning from class-imbalanced data: Review of methods and applications
Haixiang, G., Yijing, L., Shang, J., Mingyun, G., Yuanyue, H., & Bing, G. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.035 · Cited by 2,377
A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development
Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191 · Cited by 1,622
A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems
Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., & Turskis, Z. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2017-0458 · Cited by 1,117
A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques
Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016 · Cited by 492
Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: A survey of the current state of the art
de Brito, M. M., & Evers, M. (2016) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 250
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1169237817
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 177
- FWCI
- 50.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019
- The paper
- Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016). ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
