The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of surgical resection in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline
Open accessAbstract
QUESTION: Should patients with newly-diagnosed metastatic brain tumors undergo open surgical resection versus whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and/or other treatment modalities such as radiosurgery, and in what clinical settings? Target population These recommendations apply to adults with a newly diagnosed single brain metastasis amenable to surgical resection. Recommendations Surgical resection plus WBRT versus surgical resection alone Level 1 Surgical resection followed by WBRT represents a superior treatment modality, in terms of improving tumor control at the original site of the metastasis and in the brain overall, when compared to surgical resection alone. Surgical resection plus WBRT versus SRS +/- WBRT Level 2 Surgical resection plus WBRT, versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plus WBRT, both represent effective treatment strategies, resulting in relatively equal survival rates. SRS has not been assessed from an evidence-based standpoint for larger lesions (>3 cm) or for those causing significant mass effect (>1 cm midline shift). Level 3 Underpowered class I evidence along with the preponderance of conflicting class II evidence suggests that SRS alone may provide equivalent functional and survival outcomes compared with resection + WBRT for patients with single brain metastases, so long as ready detection of distant site failure and salvage SRS are possible. Note The following question is fully addressed in the WBRT guideline paper within this series by Gaspar et al. Given that the recommendation resulting from the systematic review of the literature on this topic is also highly relevant to the discussion of the role of surgical resection in the management of brain metastases, this recommendation has been included below. Question Does surgical resection in addition to WBRT improve outcomes when compared with WBRT alone? Target population This recommendation applies to adults with a newly diagnosed single brain metastasis amenable to surgical resection; however, the recommendation does not apply to relatively radiosensitive tumors histologies (i.e., small cell lung cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, germ cell tumors and multiple myeloma). Recommendation Surgical resection plus WBRT versus WBRT alone Level 1 Class I evidence supports the use of surgical resection plus post-operative WBRT, as compared to WBRT alone, in patients with good performance status (functionally independent and spending less than 50% of time in bed) and limited extra-cranial disease. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for patients with poor performance scores, advanced systemic disease, or multiple brain metastases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials
Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Moseley, A. M., & Elkins, M. (2003) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/83.8.713 · Cited by 4,808
Cited by
Tsao, M. N., Rades, D., Wirth, A., Lo, S. S., Danielson, B. L., Gaspar, L. E., Sperduto, P. W., Vogelbaum, M. A., Radawski, J. D., Wang, J. Z., et al. (2012) · Practical Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.prro.2011.12.004 · Cited by 587
Self-citationColorectal cancer: Metastases to a single organ
Vatandoust, S. (2015) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11767 · Cited by 308
Gaspar, L. E., Mehta, M. P., Patchell, R. A., Burri, S. H., Robinson, P. D., Morris, R. E., Ammirati, M., Andrews, D. W., Asher, A. L., Cobbs, C. S., et al. (2010) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-009-0060-9 · Cited by 299
Self-citationDavis, F. G., Dolecek, T. A., McCarthy, B. J., & Villano, J. L. (2012) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos152 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalkanis, S. N., Kondziolka, D., Gaspar, L. E., Burri, S. H., Asher, A. L., Cobbs, C. S., Ammirati, M., Robinson, P. D., Andrews, D. W., Loeffler, J. S., McDermott, M., Mehta, M. P., Mikkelsen, T., Olson, J. J., Paleologos, N. A., Patchell, R. A., Ryken, T. C., & Linskey, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuro-Oncology
- Published
- 2009-12-04
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-43
- ISSN
- 0167-594X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7373
- OpenAlex
- W1986254095
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of surgical resection in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11060-009-0061-8
- The paper
- Kalkanis, S. N., Kondziolka, D., Gaspar, L. E., Burri, S. H., Asher, A. L., Cobbs, C. S., Ammirati, M., Robinson, P. D., Andrews, D. W., Loeffler, J. S., McDermott, M., Mehta, M. P., Mikkelsen, T., Olson, J. J., Paleologos, N. A., Patchell, R. A., Ryken, T. C., & Linskey, M. E. (2010). The role of surgical resection in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-0061-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.