Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of whole brain radiation therapy in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline

Open access
Gaspar, Laurie E., Mehta, Minesh P., Patchell, Roy A., Burri, Stuart H., Robinson, Paula D., Morris, Rachel E., Ammirati, Mario, Andrews, David W., Asher, Anthony L., Cobbs, Charles S., Kondziolka, Douglas, Linskey, Mark E., Loeffler, Jay S., McDermott, Michael, Mikkelsen, Tom, Olson, Jeffrey J., Paleologos, Nina A., Ryken, Timothy C., Kalkanis, Steven N.·2010·Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Abstract

Target population This recommendation applies to adults with newly diagnosed single brain metastases amenable to surgical resection; however, the recommendation does not apply to relatively radiosensitive tumors histologies (i.e., small cell lung cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, germ cell tumors and multiple myeloma). Recommendation Surgical resection plus WBRT versus WBRT alone Level 1 Class I evidence supports the use of surgical resection plus post-operative WBRT, as compared to WBRT alone, in patients with good performance status (functionally independent and spending less than 50% of time in bed) and limited extra-cranial disease. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for patients with poor performance scores, advanced systemic disease, or multiple brain metastases. If WBRT is used, is there an optimal dosing/fractionation schedule? Target population This recommendation applies to adults with newly diagnosed brain metastases. Recommendation Level 1 Class I evidence suggests that altered dose/fractionation schedules of WBRT do not result in significant differences in median survival, local control or neurocognitive outcomes when compared with “standard” WBRT dose/fractionation. (i.e., 30 Gy in 10 fractions or a biologically effective dose (BED) of 39 Gy10). If WBRT is used, what impact does tumor histopathology have on treatment outcomes? Target population This recommendation applies to adults with newly diagnosed brain metastases. Recommendation Given the extremely limited data available, there is insufficient evidence to support the choice of any particular dose/fractionation regimen based on histopathology. The following question is fully addressed in the surgery guideline paper within this series by Kalkanis et al. Given that the recommendation resulting from the systematic review of the literature on this topic is also highly relevant to the discussion of the role of WBRT in the management of brain metastases, this recommendation has been included below. Does the addition of WBRT after surgical resection improve outcomes when compared with surgical resection alone? Target population This recommendation applies to adults with newly diagnosed single brain metastases amenable to surgical resection. Recommendation Surgical resection plus WBRT versus surgical resection alone Level 1 Surgical resection followed by WBRT represents a superior treatment modality, in terms of improving tumor control at the original site of the metastasis and in the brain overall, when compared to surgical resection alone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11060-009-0060-9

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Gaspar, L. E., Mehta, M. P., Patchell, R. A., Burri, S. H., Robinson, P. D., Morris, R. E., Ammirati, M., Andrews, D. W., Asher, A. L., Cobbs, C. S., Kondziolka, D., Linskey, M. E., Loeffler, J. S., McDermott, M., Mikkelsen, T., Olson, J. J., Paleologos, N. A., Ryken, T. C., & Kalkanis, S. N.
Venue
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2009-12-04
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
17-32
ISSN
  • 0167-594X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7373
OpenAlex
W2153022133
Cited by
299
References
19
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of whole brain radiation therapy in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11060-009-0060-9
The paper
Gaspar, L. E., Mehta, M. P., Patchell, R. A., Burri, S. H., Robinson, P. D., Morris, R. E., Ammirati, M., Andrews, D. W., Asher, A. L., Cobbs, C. S., Kondziolka, D., Linskey, M. E., Loeffler, J. S., McDermott, M., Mikkelsen, T., Olson, J. J., Paleologos, N. A., Ryken, T. C., & Kalkanis, S. N. (2010). The role of whole brain radiation therapy in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-0060-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.