Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bevacizumab therapy for adults with recurrent/progressive meningioma: a retrospective series

Open access
Lou, Emil, Sumrall, Ashley L., Turner, Scott, Peters, Katherine B., Desjardins, Annick, Vredenburgh, James J., McLendon, Roger E., Herndon, James E., McSherry, Frances, Norfleet, Julie, Friedman, Henry S., Reardon, David A.·2012·Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Abstract

Intracranial meningiomas are often indolent tumors which typically grow over years to decades. Nonetheless, meningiomas that progress after maximum safe resection and radiation therapy pose a significant therapeutic challenge and effective therapies have yet to be identified. Preclinical studies implicate angiogenesis in the pathophysiology of more aggressive meningiomas, suggesting that anti-angiogenic therapies may be of utility in this setting. We performed a retrospective review of fourteen patients with recurrent meningioma treated at Duke University Medical Center with bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, administered either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Most patients were heavily pre-treated. Progression-free survival at 6 months was 86 % and was comparable regardless of meningioma grade and whether bevacizumab was administered as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Most toxicities were mild however single patients developed CNS hemorrhage (grade 1) and intestinal perforation (grade 4), respectively. Bevacizumab can be administered safely to patients with meningioma and appears to be associated with encouraging anti-tumor effect when administered as either a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy. Phase II trials investigating bevacizumab in patients with progressive/recurrent meningioma are warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11060-012-0861-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Lou, E., Sumrall, A. L., Turner, S., Peters, K. B., Desjardins, A., Vredenburgh, J. J., McLendon, R. E., Herndon, J. E., McSherry, F., Norfleet, J., Friedman, H. S., & Reardon, D. A.
Venue
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2012-04-26
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
63-70
ISSN
  • 0167-594X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7373
OpenAlex
W2090169598
Cited by
196
References
1
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bevacizumab therapy for adults with recurrent/progressive meningioma: a retrospective series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11060-012-0861-0
The paper
Lou, E., Sumrall, A. L., Turner, S., Peters, K. B., Desjardins, A., Vredenburgh, J. J., McLendon, R. E., Herndon, J. E., McSherry, F., Norfleet, J., Friedman, H. S., & Reardon, D. A. (2012). Bevacizumab therapy for adults with recurrent/progressive meningioma: a retrospective series. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0861-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.