The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Image Inpainting: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Although image inpainting, or the art of repairing the old and deteriorated images, has been around for many years, it has recently gained even more popularity, because of the recent development in image processing techniques. With the improvement of image processing tools and the flexibility of digital image editing, automatic image inpainting has found important applications in computer vision and has also become an important and challenging topic of research in image processing. This paper reviews the existing image inpainting approaches, that were classified into three subcategories, sequential-based, CNN-based, and GAN-based methods. In addition, for each category, a list of methods for different types of distortion on images are presented. Furthermore, the paper also presents available datasets. Last but not least, we present the results of real evaluations of the three categories of image inpainting methods performed on the used datasets, for different types of image distortion. We also present the evaluations metrics and discuss the performance of these methods in terms of these metrics. This overview can be used as a reference for image inpainting researchers, and it can also facilitate the comparison of the methods as well as the datasets used. The main contribution of this paper is the presentation of the three categories of image inpainting methods along with a list of available datasets that the researchers can use to evaluate their proposed methodology against.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding
Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., & Schiele, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.350 · Cited by 12,433
Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpainting
Pathak, D., Krahenbuhl, P., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Efros, A. A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.278 · Cited by 5,691
Places: A 10 Million Image Database for Scene Recognition
Zhou, B., Lapedriza, A., Khosla, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2017.2723009 · Cited by 4,042
3D Object Representations for Fine-Grained Categorization
Krause, J., Stark, M., Deng, J., & Fei-Fei, L. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2013.77 · Cited by 3,496
ICDAR 2013 Robust Reading Competition
Karatzas, D., Shafait, F., Uchida, S., Iwamura, M., Bigorda, L. G. I., Mestre, S. R., Mas, J., Mota, D. F., Almazan, J. A., & de las Heras, L. P. (2013) · 2013 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition · doi:10.1109/icdar.2013.221 · Cited by 1,360
High-Resolution Stereo Datasets with Subpixel-Accurate Ground Truth
Scharstein, D., Hirschmüller, H., Kitajima, Y., Krathwohl, G., Nešić, N., Wang, X., & Westling, P. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11752-2_3 · Cited by 1,305
Semantic Image Inpainting with Deep Generative Models
Yeh, R. A., Chen, C., Lim, T. Y., Schwing, A. G., Hasegawa-Johnson, M., & Do, M. N. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.728 · Cited by 1,206
Evaluation of Cost Functions for Stereo Matching
Hirschmuller, H., & Scharstein, D. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383248 · Cited by 1,122
Multimodal Deep Autoencoder for Human Pose Recovery
Hong, C., Yu, J., Wan, J., Tao, D., & Wang, M. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2487860 · Cited by 568
Metadata
- Authors
- Elharrouss, O., Almaadeed, N., Al-Maadeed, S., & Akbari, Y.
- Venue
- Neural Processing Letters
- Published
- 2019-12-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2007-2028
- ISSN
- 1370-4621 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-773X
- OpenAlex
- W2992838650
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image Inpainting: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11063-019-10163-0
- The paper
- Elharrouss, O., Almaadeed, N., Al-Maadeed, S., & Akbari, Y. (2020). Image Inpainting: A Review. Neural Processing Letters. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-10163-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
