Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,122

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of Cost Functions for Stereo Matching

Hirschmuller, Heiko, Scharstein, Daniel·2007·2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Stereo correspondence methods rely on matching costs for computing the similarity of image locations. In this paper we evaluate the insensitivity of different matching costs with respect to radiometric variations of the input images. We consider both pixel-based and window-based variants and measure their performance in the presence of global intensity changes (e.g., due to gain and exposure differences), local intensity changes (e.g., due to vignetting, non-Lambertian surfaces, and varying lighting), and noise. Using existing stereo datasets with ground-truth disparities as well as six new datasets taken under controlled changes of exposure and lighting, we evaluate the different costs with a local, a semi-global, and a global stereo method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2007.383248

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 1,122

Metadata

Authors
Hirschmuller, H., & Scharstein, D.
Venue
2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2007-06
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133255058
Cited by
1,122
References
19
FWCI
27.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Cost Functions for Stereo Matching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2007.383248
The paper
Hirschmuller, H., & Scharstein, D. (2007). Evaluation of Cost Functions for Stereo Matching. 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2007.383248

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.