Cited by 2Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsChaos control and synchronization

Adaptive Decentralized Tracking Control for a Class of Large-Scale Nonlinear Systems with Dynamic Uncertainties Using Multi-dimensional Taylor Network Approach

Shan, Zheng-Duo, He, Wen-Jing, Han, Yu-Qun, Zhu, Shan-Liang·2023·Neural Processing Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11063-022-11020-3

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Shan, Z.-D., He, W.-J., Han, Y.-Q., & Zhu, S.-L.
Affiliations
Qingdao University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhu, Shan-Liang
Venue
Neural Processing Letters
Published
2022-09-06
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
3509-3531
ISSN
  • 1370-4621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-773X
OpenAlex
W4294754978
Cited by
2
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neural Processing Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2020QF055)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
Keywords
decentralized control, output tracking control, large-scale nonlinear systems, dynamic uncertainty, multi-dimensional Taylor network, adaptive control, backstepping control, unknown nonlinearities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review