Metamemory Experiments in Neurological Populations: A Review
Abstract
Metamemory refers to knowledge about one's memory capabilities and strategies that can aid memory, as well as the processes involved in memory self-monitoring. Although metamemory has been studied in cognitive psychology for several decades, there have been fewer studies investigating the neuropsychology of metamemory. In recent years, a growing number of studies of neurological patient groups have been conducted in order to investigate the neural correlates of metamemory. In this review, we examine the neuropsychological evidence that the frontal lobes are critically involved in monitoring and control processes, which are the central components of metamemory. The following conclusions are drawn from this literature: (1) There is a strong correlation between indices of frontal lobe function or structural integrity and metamemory accuracy (2) The combination of frontal lobe dysfunction and poor memory severely impairs metamemorial processes (3) Metamemory tasks vary in subject performance levels, and quite likely, in the underlying processes these different tasks measure, and (4) Metamemory, as measured by experimental tasks, may dissociate from basic memory retrieval processes and from global judgments of memory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Frontal cortex impairments also increase vulnerability to word retrieval difficulties.
“Frontal cortex impairments also increase vulnerability to word retrieval difficulties (Pannu and Kaszniak, 2005).”
From Global Workspace Dynamics: Cortical “Binding and Propagation” Enables Conscious Contents (2013) · cites this paper as Pannu and Kaszniak, 2005
Human prefrontal cortex plays a key role in supporting metacognitive capacity, often on memory tasks.
“Pioneering neuropsychological investigations of patients with frontal lobe damage have identified a key role for human prefrontal cortex in supporting metacognitive capacity, often on memory tasks (see Fleming & Dolan 2012, Pannu & Kaszniak 2005 for reviews).”
From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Pannu & Kaszniak 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 140 · Cited by 240
- Authors
- Pannu, J. K., & Kaszniak, A. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pannu, Jasmeet K.
- Venue
- Neuropsychology Review
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 105-130
- ISSN
- 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6660
- OpenAlex
- W2141704738
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 140
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- metamemory, frontal lobe dysfunction, memory retrieval
- MeSH terms
- Frontal Lobe, Humans, Judgment, Memory Disorders, Nervous System Diseases, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Statistics as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review