The Earthquake Readiness Scale: The Development of a Valid and Reliable Unifactorial Measure
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The questionnaire items were adapted from the Household Emergency Preparedness Instrument (HEPI), the Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threat Scale (PPDTS), and the Earthquake Readiness Scale (ERS).
“Items were adapted from the Household Emergency Preparedness Instrument (HEPI) (Heagele et al., 2023), the Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threat Scale (PPDTS) (McLennan et al., 2020), and the Earthquake Readiness Scale (ERS) (Spittal et al., 2006).”
From Assessing earthquake preparedness in a culturally diverse international students population: a case of Ehime university in Shikoku, Japan (2025) · cites this paper as Spittal et al., 2006
Cites
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications
Cortina, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 · Cited by 8,810 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Atalyan, T., & Bhandary, N. P. (2025) · Journal of Disaster Science and Management · doi:10.1007/s44367-025-00024-0 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Spittal, M. J., Walkey, F. H., McClure, J., Siegert, R. J., & Ballantyne, K. E.
- Affiliations
- Cancer Council Victoria (AU)
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Spittal, Matthew J.
- Venue
- Natural Hazards
- Published
- 2006-06-21
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-29
- ISSN
- 0921-030X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0840
- OpenAlex
- W2149393873
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Natural Hazards (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Earthquake Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- earthquake preparedness, scale development, psychometric validation, emergency kit
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
