Assessing earthquake preparedness in a culturally diverse international students population: a case of Ehime university in Shikoku, Japan
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: International students in Japan face unique challenges in earthquake preparedness, despite the country’s globally recognized disaster management systems. This exploratory study presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first assessment of preparedness among this population using a unified, multidimensional framework. Method: Five key dimensions were evaluated: education and awareness, practical preparedness, behavioral preparedness, perceived earthquake risk and emotional response, and confidence in managing earthquake situations. A structured online survey was completed by 113 students from 29 countries. The questionnaire was developed using validated instruments and informed by established theoretical models. Result: Among all dimensions, education and awareness demonstrated the strongest association with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818). It was also significantly correlated with behavioral preparedness (ρ = 0.574), practical preparedness (ρ = 0.559), and confidence in managing earthquake situations (ρ = 0.570). However, no significant relationship was found with perceived earthquake risk and emotional response (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243). Notably, prior experience with earthquakes did not significantly influence students’ preparedness levels (U = 1416.5, p = 0.658). Qualitative feedback highlighted barriers, including a lack of localized information, language challenges, and emotional anxiety. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the need for inclusive, action-oriented disaster education tailored to international student communities. This study contributes to Priority 1 of the Sendai Framework, which emphasizes understanding disaster risk, and provides a foundation for future cross-cultural disaster risk reduction research.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This exploratory survey of 113 international students at Ehime University assessed earthquake preparedness across five dimensions and found education/awareness most strongly correlated with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818), while prior earthquake experience had no significant effect (p = 0.658). Despite higher perceived risk and education scores, practical and behavioral preparedness were lower, revealing a readiness-action gap and barriers such as lack of information, motivation, and cost.
Key findings
- Education and awareness had the strongest positive association with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818, p < 0.001) and was also significantly correlated with behavioral preparedness (ρ = 0.574), confidence (ρ = 0.570), and practical preparedness (ρ = 0.559); it was not significantly correlated with perceived risk and emotional response (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243).
- Prior earthquake experience did not significantly influence overall preparedness: Mann-Whitney U = 1416.5, p = 0.658, with mean ranks of 58.05 for prior experience (n = 71) and 55.23 for no prior experience (n = 42).
- Mean scores were highest for Perceived Risk (M = 2.76), Education (M = 2.74), and Confidence (M = 2.61), but lower for Behavioral Preparedness (M = 2.37) and Practical Preparedness (M = 2.33); only 11.5% reported completing all recommended preparedness actions, while 20.4% had taken none in the past six months.
- Reported barriers included lack of information or training (33.6%), lack of motivation (30.1%), and cost-related concerns (23.9%); 79.6% were familiar with the Earthquake Early Warning system, but only 54.0% knew the nearest evacuation point and 30.1% had a physical copy of emergency contact numbers.
Methods
- Online survey of international students at Ehime University in Matsuyama City, Japan; all 224 international students were invited, and 113 valid responses were collected (response rate = 50.4%) from 29 countries, with no missing data.
- The questionnaire contained 42 items (41 analyzed) covering five dimensions: education and awareness, practical preparedness, behavioral preparedness, perceived earthquake risk and emotional response, and confidence in managing earthquake situations; items were adapted from HEPI, PPDTS, and ERS and informed by EPPM and PADM.
- Analysis used SPSS Statistics Version 29, including descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman’s rank-order correlations, Mann-Whitney U tests, and inductive thematic analysis of 20 open-ended responses.
Limitations
- Stated: the instrument was developed for exploratory purposes and has not undergone full psychometric validation; two subscales had Cronbach’s alpha below 0.70 (Education α = 0.615; Behavioral Preparedness α = 0.632) but were retained for exploratory research.
- Stated: the qualitative component was limited, relying on a single optional item (n = 20); the cross-sectional design limits causal inference; and the single-university setting may constrain generalizability.
- Evident from the text: the sample is from one university and is predominantly from Asia (77.0%) and doctoral students (49.6%), and all preparedness measures are self-reported, which may limit broader generalization and introduce response biases.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
5 of 25 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The relationship between disaster experience and preparedness is not linear.
“Further research has shown that the relationship between disaster experience and preparedness is not linear.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Becker et al., 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Emotional and cognitive readiness may not lead to protective action unless barriers such as time, resources, and personal relevance are addressed.
“One study found that emotional and cognitive readiness may not lead to protective action unless barriers such as time, resources, and personal relevance are addressed (Gowan et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gowan et al., 2015 source
The Discussion’s “Practicing resilience” section distinguishes readiness in thought and belief from readiness in action, while “Preventive practice and promoting readiness” emphasizes resources and personally meaningful choices. These passages support the general point that awareness alone is not action, but they do not identify lack of time as a barrier or report a study finding that addressing those barriers leads to protective action (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
A structured online survey was completed by 113 international students from 29 countries.
“A structured online survey was completed by 113 students from 29 countries.”
- Also stated in: § Participant characteristics · plain
“The final sample consisted of 113 international students from 29 countries, which highlights a diverse global representation at Ehime University.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Also stated in: § Participant characteristics · plain
- Findingown data
Among all dimensions, education and awareness demonstrated the strongest association with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818).
“Among all dimensions, education and awareness demonstrated the strongest association with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818).”
- Also stated in: § Correlation between preparedness dimensions and overall preparedness · plain
“The strongest correlation was observed for Education, followed by Behavioral Preparedness, Practical Preparedness, and Confidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Also stated in: § Correlation between preparedness dimensions and overall preparedness · plain
- Findingown data
Education and awareness was significantly correlated with confidence in managing earthquake situations (ρ = 0.570).
“It was also significantly correlated with behavioral preparedness (ρ = 0.574), practical preparedness (ρ = 0.559), and confidence in managing earthquake situations (ρ = 0.570).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
The Confidence subscale demonstrated excellent reliability (α = 0.888).
“The Confidence subscale demonstrated excellent reliability (α = 0.888), followed by Perceived Risk (α = 0.763) and Practical Preparedness (α = 0.706).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Findingown data
Prior experience with earthquakes did not significantly influence students' preparedness levels (U = 1416.5, p = 0.658).
“Notably, prior experience with earthquakes did not significantly influence students' preparedness levels (U = 1416.5,p = 0.658).”
- Also stated in: § Participant characteristics · hedged
“The results indicate no statistically significant difference in overall preparedness between the two groups, although the group with prior experience showed a slightly higher mean rank than those without.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Also stated in: § Participant characteristics · hedged
- Findingown data
Qualitative feedback highlighted barriers including a lack of localized information, language challenges, and emotional anxiety.
“Qualitative feedback highlighted barriers, including a lack of localized information, language challenges, and emotional anxiety.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
Education and awareness was significantly correlated with behavioral preparedness (ρ = 0.574).
“It was also significantly correlated with behavioral preparedness (ρ = 0.574), practical preparedness (ρ = 0.559), and confidence in managing earthquake situations (ρ = 0.570).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
Education and awareness was significantly correlated with practical preparedness (ρ = 0.559).
“It was also significantly correlated with behavioral preparedness (ρ = 0.574), practical preparedness (ρ = 0.559), and confidence in managing earthquake situations (ρ = 0.570).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
Cronbach's alpha values for the preparedness subscales ranged from 0.615 to 0.888.
“Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of each preparedness subscale, with values ranging from 0.615 to 0.888.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Findingown data
23.9% of participants identified the perceived high cost of preparedness as a barrier to preparedness.
“Participants identified key barriers to preparedness, including a lack of information or training (33.6%), low motivation to prepare (30.1%), and the perceived high cost of preparedness (23.9%), particularly emergency kits and supplies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Several participants noted that preparedness messages and drills being primarily in Japanese limited their understanding.
“Several participants noted that preparedness messages and drills being primarily in Japanese limited their understanding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
20.4% created a personal emergency plan.
“Attending an educational session, workshop, or seminar was reported by 41.6%, while fewer had checked or updated emergency supplies (27.4%), identified evacuation routes and safe zones (24.8%), or created a personal emergency plan (20.4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
33.6% of participants identified lack of information or training as a barrier to preparedness.
“Participants identified key barriers to preparedness, including a lack of information or training (33.6%), low motivation to prepare (30.1%), and the perceived high cost of preparedness (23.9%), particularly emergency kits and supplies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
27.4% checked or updated emergency supplies.
“Attending an educational session, workshop, or seminar was reported by 41.6%, while fewer had checked or updated emergency supplies (27.4%), identified evacuation routes and safe zones (24.8%), or created a personal emergency plan (20.4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
The Practical Preparedness subscale had reliability α = 0.706.
“The Confidence subscale demonstrated excellent reliability (α = 0.888), followed by Perceived Risk (α = 0.763) and Practical Preparedness (α = 0.706).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Findingown data
In the past six months, 46.9% of participants reported reading articles or watching videos on earthquake preparedness.
“When asked about actions taken in the past six months to improve their earthquake preparedness, nearly half of the participants reported reading articles or watching videos on the topic (46.9%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
All five preparedness dimensions exhibit statistically significant positive correlations with overall preparedness.
“All five dimensions exhibit statistically significant positive correlations with overall preparedness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
The Education subscale had marginal but acceptable reliability (α = 0.615).
“The Education (α = 0.615) and Behavioral Preparedness (α = 0.632) subscales showed marginal but acceptable reliability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Findingown data
12.4% coped by distracting themselves with other activities such as music, movies, or hobbies.
“A smaller proportion (12.4%) coped by distracting themselves with other activities such as music, movies, or hobbies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
54.0% of students knew the location of the nearest evacuation point.
“Although 79.6% of students reported being aware of Japan's Earthquake Early Warning system, only 54.0% knew the location of the nearest evacuation point, and just 30.1% had a physical copy of emergency contact numbers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Education was significantly associated with Confidence (ρ = 0.570).
“Beyond its correlation with overall preparedness, Education was significantly associated with Behavioral Preparedness (ρ = 0.574), Confidence (ρ = 0.570), and Practical Preparedness (ρ = 0.559), suggesting that participants with greater earthquake-related knowledge also tended to report more proactive behaviors, higher confidence, and greater engagement in practical preparedness measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Perceived Risk subscale had reliability α = 0.763.
“The Confidence subscale demonstrated excellent reliability (α = 0.888), followed by Perceived Risk (α = 0.763) and Practical Preparedness (α = 0.706).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Findingown data
30.1% of students had a physical copy of emergency contact numbers.
“Although 79.6% of students reported being aware of Japan's Earthquake Early Warning system, only 54.0% knew the location of the nearest evacuation point, and just 30.1% had a physical copy of emergency contact numbers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
24.8% identified evacuation routes and safe zones.
“Attending an educational session, workshop, or seminar was reported by 41.6%, while fewer had checked or updated emergency supplies (27.4%), identified evacuation routes and safe zones (24.8%), or created a personal emergency plan (20.4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
19.5% indicated they did not use any coping strategies.
“Notably, 19.5% indicated they did not use any coping strategies (Fig. 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
Education emerged as the strongest correlation of overall preparedness.
“Education emerged as the strongest correlation of overall preparedness and was also significantly associated with behavioral preparedness, confidence, and practical readiness.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
“Among all dimensions, education and awareness showed the strongest positive correlation with overall preparedness, highlighting its potential importance as an indicator of disaster readiness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
- Findingown data
Education was significantly associated with Practical Preparedness (ρ = 0.559).
“Beyond its correlation with overall preparedness, Education was significantly associated with Behavioral Preparedness (ρ = 0.574), Confidence (ρ = 0.570), and Practical Preparedness (ρ = 0.559), suggesting that participants with greater earthquake-related knowledge also tended to report more proactive behaviors, higher confidence, and greater engagement in practical preparedness measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only 20.4% of participants had taken part in an earthquake drill in the past six months.
“For instance, only 20.4% of participants had taken part in an earthquake drill in the past six months, referring to a specific type of preparedness activity, while 41.6% attended an educational session or workshop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
79.6% of students reported being aware of Japan's Earthquake Early Warning system.
“Although 79.6% of students reported being aware of Japan's Earthquake Early Warning system, only 54.0% knew the location of the nearest evacuation point, and just 30.1% had a physical copy of emergency contact numbers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A few participants described feelings of fear and uncertainty about potential major earthquakes.
“A few participants described feelings of fear and uncertainty about potential major earthquakes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Education and awareness was not significantly associated with perceived earthquake risk and emotional response.
“In contrast, education and awareness was not significantly associated with perceived earthquake risk and emotional response, suggesting that informational exposure may influence preparedness primarily through cognitive and behavioral pathways rather than emotional concern.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
11.5% indicated that they had already taken all necessary preparedness actions.
“Only 11.5% indicated that they had already taken all necessary preparedness actions (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
41.6% attended an educational session, workshop, or seminar.
“Attending an educational session, workshop, or seminar was reported by 41.6%, while fewer had checked or updated emergency supplies (27.4%), identified evacuation routes and safe zones (24.8%), or created a personal emergency plan (20.4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
20.4% of respondents indicated that they had not taken any preparedness steps in the past six months.
“Notably, 20.4% of respondents indicated that they had not taken any preparedness steps in the past six months (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Findingown data
41.6% of participants attended an educational session or workshop.
“For instance, only 20.4% of participants had taken part in an earthquake drill in the past six months, referring to a specific type of preparedness activity, while 41.6% attended an educational session or workshop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Education was not significantly correlated with Perceived Risk (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243).
“In contrast, Education was not significantly correlated with Perceived Risk (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243), suggesting that its influence may operate more through cognitive and behavioral channels than through emotional reactivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Behavioral Preparedness subscale had marginal but acceptable reliability (α = 0.632).
“The Education (α = 0.615) and Behavioral Preparedness (α = 0.632) subscales showed marginal but acceptable reliability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Findingown data
No significant difference in preparedness levels was found between students with and without prior earthquake experience (U = 1416.5, p = 0.658).
“Interestingly, no significant difference in preparedness levels was found between students with and without prior earthquake experience (U = 1416.5,p = 0.658).”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · hedged
“Additionally, prior earthquake experience did not emerge as a significant predictor, reinforcing the view that past exposure alone may not reliably influence preparedness among international students in a new cultural and institutional context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · hedged
- Findingown data
30.1% of participants identified low motivation to prepare as a barrier to preparedness.
“Participants identified key barriers to preparedness, including a lack of information or training (33.6%), low motivation to prepare (30.1%), and the perceived high cost of preparedness (23.9%), particularly emergency kits and supplies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Education was significantly associated with Behavioral Preparedness (ρ = 0.574).
“Beyond its correlation with overall preparedness, Education was significantly associated with Behavioral Preparedness (ρ = 0.574), Confidence (ρ = 0.570), and Practical Preparedness (ρ = 0.559), suggesting that participants with greater earthquake-related knowledge also tended to report more proactive behaviors, higher confidence, and greater engagement in practical preparedness measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Shikoku faces significant seismic hazards associated with the Nankai Trough megathrust and the Median Tectonic Line fault system.
“Shikoku faces significant seismic hazards associated with the Nankai Trough megathrust and the Median Tectonic Line fault system (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Japan Meteorological Agency, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductcitation
The questionnaire items were adapted from the Household Emergency Preparedness Instrument (HEPI), the Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threat Scale (PPDTS), and the Earthquake Readiness Scale (ERS).
“Items were adapted from the Household Emergency Preparedness Instrument (HEPI) (Heagele et al., 2023), the Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threat Scale (PPDTS) (McLennan et al., 2020), and the Earthquake Readiness Scale (ERS) (Spittal et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
This study presents the first assessment of earthquake preparedness among international students using a unified, multidimensional framework.
“This exploratory study presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first assessment of preparedness among this population using a unified, multidimensional framework.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Firsthand experience does not necessarily translate into heightened awareness or preparedness, especially when the seismic events are less severe.
“This reinforces the notion that firsthand experience does not necessarily translate into heightened awareness or preparedness, especially when the seismic events are less severe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The study's findings align with the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM).
“These findings align with the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM), which emphasizes how individuals process hazard information, assess recommended actions, and evaluate source credibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] McLennan, J., Marques, M. D., & Every, D. (2020). Conceptualising and measuring psychological preparedness for disaster: The psychological preparedness for disaster threat scale. Natural Hazards, 101(1), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03866-4 source
- Interpretationown data
Internal readiness is not always sufficient to drive preparedness behavior.
“Reported barriers, such as a lack of information or training (33.6%), low motivation (30.1%), and financial constraints, including the cost of emergency kits and supplies (23.9%), suggest that internal readiness is not always sufficient to drive preparedness behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Interpretationown data
Education's influence may operate more through cognitive and behavioral channels than through emotional reactivity.
“suggesting that its influence may operate more through cognitive and behavioral channels than through emotional reactivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Informational exposure may influence preparedness primarily through cognitive and behavioral pathways rather than emotional concern.
“suggesting that informational exposure may influence preparedness primarily through cognitive and behavioral pathways rather than emotional concern.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Past exposure alone is not a sufficient predictor of preparedness, particularly in transnational or culturally unfamiliar settings.
“While experience is often assumed to enhance disaster readiness, this finding suggests that past exposure alone is not sufficient predictor, particularly in transnational or culturally unfamiliar settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Education may serve as a key indicator of earthquake readiness in this population.
“Among all preparedness dimensions, Education showed the strongest positive association with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818), suggesting it may serve as a key indicator of earthquake readiness in this population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Premisecitation
Even individuals with high perceived efficacy may fail to take action in the absence of behavioral drivers such as intention, experience, or situational cues.
“Another study reported that even individuals with high perceived efficacy may fail to take action in the absence of behavioral drivers such as intention, experience, or situational cues (Salita et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Salita et al., 2021 source
- May combine two claims. 32
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInternational students in Japan face distinct vulnerabilities and challenges including limited disaster knowledge, low levels of practical preparedness, emotional stress, and reliance on peer networks for information and support.
“These concerns are reinforced by recent studies that identify a range of challenges faced by international students in Japan, including limited disaster knowledge, low levels of practical preparedness, emotional stress, and reliance on peer networks for information and support (Bhandari, 2022;Gómez, 2013;Iizuka, 2022;Koike et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Bhandari, 2022 source
- cites Gómez, 2013 source
Sections 4.2.4 and 5.2 report reliance on friends of the same nationality for information and emotional support; section 5.1 describes anxiety and other stresses after the earthquake. Sections 4.6.2 and 5.1 identify gaps in applying training and in preparation for the days after the tremors, but do not establish generally limited disaster knowledge or low practical preparedness: 71% of surveyed students had received earthquake training. The findings concern engineering students at Tohoku University, not international students throughout Japan. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Iizuka, 2022 source
The Introduction reports limited disaster knowledge and reliance on family and same-nationality friends for information. Section 3.2 documents disaster-related anxiety, but finds it was generally greater among Japanese students. Sections 3.3 and 4.4 find that international students made more preparations than comparable Japanese students, contrary to the implication that they had especially low practical preparedness; reliance on peers for support, beyond information, is not established. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrior experience may enhance, reduce, or have no effect on preparedness, depending on how individuals interpret and internalize that experience.
“Prior experience may enhance, reduce, or have no effect on preparedness, depending on how individuals interpret and internalize that experience (Becker et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Becker et al., 2017 source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataNo significant relationship was found between education and awareness and perceived earthquake risk and emotional response (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243).
“However, no significant relationship was found with perceived earthquake risk and emotional response (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243).”
- Also stated in: § Relationships between education and other preparedness dimensions · plain
“No significant correlation was observed between Education and Perceived Risk, as summarized in Table 4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
- Also stated in: § Relationships between education and other preparedness dimensions · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn total, 113 valid responses were collected (response rate = 50.4%), with no missing data.
“In total, 113 valid responses were collected (response rate = 50.4%),with no missing data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCoping strategies for managing earthquake-related anxiety included talking with friends or family (43.4%), seeking information and reassurance from official sources (40.7%), and mentally rehearsing preparedness actions (33.6%).
“Coping strategies for managing earthquake-related anxiety included talking with friends or family (43.4%),seeking information and reassurance from official sources (40.7%), and mentally rehearsing preparedness actions (33.6%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most frequently selected barriers to preparedness were a lack of information or training (33.6%), a lack of motivation (30.1%), and cost-related concerns (23.9%).
“The most frequently selected barriers were a lack of information or training (33.6%), a lack of motivation (30.1%), and cost-related concerns, such as the expense of emergency kits and supplies (23.9%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMost respondents were between 23 and 27 years of age (32.7%).
“Most respondents were between 23 and 27 years of age (32.7%), followed by 23.9% between 28 and 32 years, 17.7% between 33 and 37 years, and 15% between 18 and 22 years, while a smaller proportion (10.6%) was 38 years or older (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly 30.1% of participants reported having a physical copy of emergency contact numbers in their emergency kit or wallet, while 69.9% did not.
“In contrast, only 30.1% of participants reported having a physical copy of emergency contact numbers (e.g., embassy, family, or local services) in their emergency kit or wallet, while 69.9% did not have anything like this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther reported barriers included time constraints (22.1%) and low perceived necessity (15.0%).
“Other reported barriers included time constraints (22.1%) and low perceived necessity (15.0%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data79.6% of participants reported familiarity with the Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) alarm alert in Japan, while 20.4% were not familiar with the system.
“Regarding the Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) alarm alert in Japan, 79.6% of participants reported familiarity with the warning, while 20.4% were not familiar with the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of participants were from Asia (77.0%), followed by Africa (17.7%), Europe (3.5%), and the Americas (1.8%).
“In terms of continental distribution, the majority were from Asia (77.0%), followed by Africa (17.7%),Europe (3.5%), and the Americas (1.8%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data62.8% of respondents (n = 71) reported having experienced an earthquake prior to arriving in Japan, while 37.2% (n = 42) had not.
“In terms of earthquake experience, 62.8% of the respondents (n = 71) reported to have experienced an earthquake prior to arriving in Japan while 37.2% (n = 42) have not”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome participants reported limited awareness of earthquake preparedness upon arriving in Japan and emphasized the need for clearer orientation.
“Some participants reported limited awareness of earthquake preparedness upon arriving in Japan and emphasized the need for clearer orientation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants expressed interest in receiving regular training and clearer announcements regarding earthquake drills.
“Participants expressed interest in receiving regular training and clearer announcements regarding earthquake drills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most common countries of origin were China (20.4%), Indonesia (15.0%), and Nepal (10.6%).
“The most common countries of origin were China (20.4%),Indonesia (15.0%), and Nepal (10.6%), characterized by high seismic hazard.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe open-ended question received 20 responses, which were manually reviewed and thematically categorized into four key themes.
“A total of 20 responses were received, manually reviewed, and thematically categorized.Four key themes emerged, illustrated with representative quotations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEducation was significantly associated with behavioral preparedness, confidence, and practical readiness.
“Education emerged as the strongest correlation of overall preparedness and was also significantly associated with behavioral preparedness, confidence, and practical readiness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe strongest correlation with overall preparedness was observed for Education, followed by Behavioral Preparedness, Practical Preparedness, and Confidence; Perceived Risk showed a more moderate correlation.
“The strongest correlation was observed for Education, followed by Behavioral Preparedness, Practical Preparedness, and Confidence.In contrast, Perceived Risk showed a more moderate correlation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA small set of open-ended responses (n = 20) provided supplementary qualitative context, offering additional insights into perceived barriers and preparedness challenges.
“A small set of open-ended responses (n = 20) provided supplementary qualitative context, offering additional insights into perceived barriers and preparedness challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFewer participants reported receiving education on communication plans (23.9%) or psychological coping strategies (8.0%).
“Fewer participants reported receiving education on communication plans (23.9%) or psychological coping strategies (8.0%) (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe dataset was complete with no missing values, as all items were mandatory.
“The dataset was complete with no missing values, as all items were mandatory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs of June 2024, Japan hosted approximately 3.6 million foreign residents, among whom over 368,000 were international students.
“As of June 2024, Japan hosted approximately 3.6 million foreign residents, among whom over 368,000 were international students (Immigration Services Agency of Japan, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Immigration Services Agency of Japan, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMost prior studies have focused primarily on specific aspects of preparedness, such as knowledge or behavior, in isolation.
“First, most prior studies have focused primarily on specific aspects of preparedness, such as knowledge or behavior, in isolation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGovernment projections warn of a worst-case nationwide disaster with 298,000 deaths (tsunami: 215,000 and building collapse: 73,000) during nighttime winter conditions with limited evacuation response.
“In this earthquake, the government projections warn of a worstcase nationwide disaster with 298,000 deaths (tsunami: 215,000 and building collapse: 73,000) during nighttime winter conditions with limited evacuation response (Cabinet Office, Government of Japan 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cabinet Office, Government of Japan 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe questionnaire was developed using validated instruments and informed by established theoretical models.
“The questionnaire was developed using validated instruments and informed by established theoretical models.”
- Also stated in: § Conceptual foundation · plain
“The questionnaire was developed through a multi-source design strategy that combined validated instruments and theoretical frameworks to ensure conceptual rigor and coverage of diverse preparedness dimensions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Conceptual foundation · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenInternational students remain underrepresented in preparedness research.
“Second, although international students represent a growing and highly diverse demographic element in Japan, they remain underrepresented in preparedness research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAs of November 30, 2024, Ehime University hosted 224 international students.
“As of November 30, 2024, Ehime University hosted 224 international students (Ehime University, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ehime University, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationAdditional items were developed based on key constructs from the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) and the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM).
“Additional items were developed based on key constructs from theoretical frameworks such as the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) (Witte, 1992) and the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM) (Lindell & Perry, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMatsuyama City is situated near the Median Tectonic Line and within a zone predicted to experience intensity 6+ during a potential Nankai Trough earthquake.
“Matsuyama City, situated near the Median Tectonic Line and within a zone predicted to experience intensity 6 + predicted intensity of shaking (Japan Meteorological Agency intensity level) during a potential Nankai Trough earthquake, provides a valuable non-metropolitan context for examining earthquake preparedness beyond Japan's major urban centers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Japan Meteorological Agency
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe risk of a major earthquake remains severe, especially from the anticipated Nankai Trough Earthquake, predicted to hit most of western Japan.
“Nevertheless, the risk of a major earthquake remains severe, especially from the anticipated Nankai Trough Earthquake, predicted to hit most of western Japan.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe probability of occurrence of the Nankai Trough Earthquake is estimated to be 70%-80% within the next 30 years.
“According to the 2025 government report, Japan's Earthquake Research Committee has estimated the probability of occurrence of the Nankai Trough Earthquake to be 70%-80% within the next 30 years (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Japan Meteorological Agency, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe single-university setting may constrain generalizability.
“In addition, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the single-university setting may constrain generalizability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIndividuals who participated in disaster education through printed materials, public meetings, or broadcasts demonstrated significantly higher levels of overall earthquake readiness.
“For example, individuals who participated in disaster education through printed materials, public meetings, or broadcasts demonstrated significantly higher levels of overall earthquake readiness (Tanaka, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tanaka, 2005 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataParticipants with greater earthquake-related knowledge tended to report more proactive behaviors, higher confidence, and greater engagement in practical preparedness measures.
“suggesting that participants with greater earthquake-related knowledge also tended to report more proactive behaviors, higher confidence, and greater engagement in practical preparedness measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningFor international students, prior experience in their home countries may not directly translate into readiness in Japan, where disaster expectations, infrastructure, and communication systems differ significantly.
“For international students, prior experience in their home countries may not directly translate into readiness in Japan, where disaster expectations, infrastructure, and communication systems differ significantly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was grounded in established theoretical frameworks and built upon previously validated preparedness constructs.
“Methodologically, the study was grounded in established theoretical frameworks and built upon previously validated preparedness constructs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe cross-sectional design limits causal inference.
“In addition, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the single-university setting may constrain generalizability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningJapan's Earthquake Early Warning system, multilingual signage, and institutionalized drills require localized understanding and support, which prior experience alone cannot provide.
“Japan's Earthquake Early Warning system, multilingual signage, and institutionalized drills require localized understanding and support, which prior experience alone cannot provide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior earthquake experience influenced teenagers' risk perception but did not necessarily lead to greater preparedness.
“Similarly, although prior earthquake experience influenced teenagers' risk perception, it did not necessarily lead to greater preparedness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kazemi et al., 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOne item (Q27) was removed from the Behavioral Preparedness subscale after preliminary inspection due to a low item-total correlation.
“One item (Q27) was removed from the Behavioral Preparedness subscale after preliminary inspection due to a low item-total correlation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThere is a readiness-action gap: despite relatively high scores in Perceived Risk, Education, and Confidence, participants reported lower levels of Practical Preparedness and Behavioral Preparedness.
“Despite relatively high scores in Perceived Risk (M = 2.76), Education (M = 2.74), and Confidence (M = 2.61), participants reported lower levels of Practical Preparedness (M = 2.33) and Behavioral Preparedness (M = 2.37).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationEducation and Behavioral Preparedness subscales yielded Cronbach's alpha values below the conventional 0.70 threshold, but were retained based on accepted standards for exploratory research (Hair et al., 2010).
“(Education and Behavioral Preparedness) yielded Cronbach's alpha values below the conventional 0.70 threshold, but were retained based on accepted standards for exploratory research (Hair et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hair et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAttention to and comprehension of hazard information has been found to be significantly associated with preparedness intentions through these same mechanisms (Li et al., 2024).
“Attention to and comprehension of hazard information has also been found to be significantly associated with preparedness intentions through these same mechanisms (Li et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThere is a gap between national-level awareness and localized, actionable preparedness, indicating that broad communication campaigns alone are insufficient for achieving effective disaster readiness.
“This points to a gap between national-level awareness and localized, actionable preparedness, indicating that broad communication campaigns alone are insufficient for achieving effective disaster readiness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe qualitative component was limited in scope and depth, relying on a single optional item.
“The qualitative component was limited in scope and depth, relying on a single optional item.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent research suggests that experiencing low to moderate magnitude earthquakes did not significantly enhance individuals' perception of earthquake occurrence (Zhang et al., 2025).
“Recent research suggests that experiencing low to moderate magnitude earthquakes did not significantly enhance individuals' perception of earthquake occurrence (Zhang et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2025 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenFew prior studies have analyzed these specific preparedness dimensions within a unified model.
“While this study statistically compared multiple preparedness components, few prior studies have analyzed these specific dimensions within a unified model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe instrument was developed for exploratory purposes and has not yet undergone full psychometric validation.
“Although the preparedness dimensions were grounded in established frameworks, the instrument was developed for exploratory purposes and has not yet undergone full psychometric validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCultural bias such as hierarchism, shaped by social surroundings, played a more influential role in shaping teenagers' risk-related attitudes.
“Instead, cultural bias such as hierarchism, shaped by social surroundings, played a more influential role in shaping their risk-related attitudes.(Kazemi et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kazemi et al., 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenExisting literature consistently emphasizes the central role of disaster education.
“However, existing literature consistently emphasizes the central role of disaster education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe structured quantitative design allowed for the identification of the most influential preparedness dimension and facilitated a broader examination of how this key factor relates to other components of readiness.
“Its structured quantitative design allowed for the identification of the most influential preparedness dimension and facilitated a broader examination of how this key factor relates to other components of readiness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn accordance with institutional policies and established guidelines for low-risk social science research, formal approval from an ethics committee was not required or sought.
“In accordance with institutional policies and established guidelines for low-risk social science research, formal approval from an ethics committee was not required or sought.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
“A structured online survey was completed by 113 students from 29 countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
“In total, 113 valid responses were collected (response rate = 50.4%),with no missing data.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
A described Yes/No item includes an unsure response
MinorThe shelter-location item is introduced as binary, but its reported responses include a third category, "unsure."
“three binary (Yes/No) items were analyzed to assess participants' awareness and basic preparedness actions.”
“54.0% of participants reported knowing the location of the nearest evacuation point or shelter near their residence in Japan, while 23.9% responded "No" and 22.1% were unsure.”
All items are called mandatory, but one is called optional
MinorThe methods say all survey items were mandatory, whereas the limitations describe a single optional qualitative item.
“The dataset was complete with no missing values, as all items were mandatory.”
“The qualitative component was limited in scope and depth, relying on a single optional item.”
Cites
Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model
Witte, K. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376276 · Cited by 3,880 · see citing works
The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x · Cited by 1,868 · see citing works
The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness
Becker, J. S., Paton, D., Johnston, D. M., Ronan, K. R., & McClure, J. (2017) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Tanaka, K. (2005) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.07.001 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
The Earthquake Readiness Scale: The Development of a Valid and Reliable Unifactorial Measure
Spittal, M. J., Walkey, F. H., McClure, J., Siegert, R. J., & Ballantyne, K. E. (2006) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-005-2369-9 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Han, Z., Wang, L., & Cui, K. (2020) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.1080/17477891.2020.1725410 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Goto, K., Ishizawa, T., Ebina, Y., Imamura, F., Sato, S., & Udo, K. (2020) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103417 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Sugawara, D. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103498 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Maly, E., & Suppasri, A. (2020) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Science · doi:10.1007/s13753-020-00268-9 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
McLennan, J., Marques, M. D., & Every, D. (2020) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-020-03866-4 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Gómez, O. A. (2013) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Science · doi:10.1007/s13753-013-0015-9 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Thorup-Binger, C., & Charania, N. A. (2019) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101136 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
Otani, S. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology · doi:10.3151/jact.2.3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Prepared for what? addressing the disaster readiness gap beyond preparedness for survival
Gowan, M. E., Sloan, J. A., & Kirk, R. C. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2440-8 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
The earthquake awareness levels of undergraduate students
Sözen, E. (2019) · Journal of Pedagogical Research · doi:10.33902/jpr.2019254175 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
豊田, 祐., Muranaka, A., Kim, D., & Kanegae, H. (2021) · Progress in Disaster Science · doi:10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100210 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Impact of an educational program on earthquake awareness and preparedness in Nepal
Subedi, S., Hetényi, G., & Shackleton, R. T. (2020) · Geoscience Communication · doi:10.5194/gc-3-279-2020 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Assessing international students’ vulnerability to hurricanes: University of Florida case study
Abukhalaf, A. H. I., von Meding, J., Dooling, J. R., & Abusal, D. M. (2022) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102812 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Salita, C., Tiongco, R. E., & Kawano, R. (2021) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-020-01237-8 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Li, R., Gilbert, C., Colle, B. A., & Moses, J. M. (2024) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105009 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Factors Affecting Household Disaster Preparedness Among Foreign Residents in Japan
Green, D. G., Linley, M., Whitney, J., & Sano, Y. (2020) · Social Science Japan Journal · doi:10.1093/ssjj/jyaa026 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Abukhalaf, A. H. I., & von Meding, J. K. (2021) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-021-04859-7 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Developing a new individual earthquake resilience questionnaire: A reliability and validity test
Jiang, N., Cheng, J., Ni, Z., Ye, Y., Hu, R., & Jiang, X. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245662 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Iizuka, A. (2022) · Progress in Disaster Science · doi:10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100239 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Adu-Gyamfi, B., & Shaw, R. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191811469 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Heagele, T. N., Adams, L. M., McNeill, C., & Alfred, D. M. (2022) · Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness · doi:10.1017/dmp.2022.35 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Disaster preparedness among foreign residents in a rural area of Japan: A qualitative pilot study
NISHIYAMA, M., & GLAUBERMAN, G. H. R. (2022) · Health Emergency and Disaster Nursing · doi:10.24298/hedn.2020-0013 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Adu-Gyamfi, B., & Shaw, R. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13115786 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Examining middle school students’ knowledge and beliefs about earthquake and tsunami
Lownsbery, D. S., & Flick, L. B. (2020) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2019.1707587 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Formation and Development of “Disaster Resilience Theory” in Japan
Ishihara, R. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14475-3_13 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Building Disaster Resilience Through Primary and Higher Education
Topno, P. N. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61278-8_9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Preparedness for a forgotten disaster: A case study Coimbatore, India
Prakash, E. L., Anand, K. B., & Kolathayar, S. (2024) · Progress in Disaster Science · doi:10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100340 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Earthquake and tsunami preparedness between residents and tourists in coastal communities
Cisternas, P. C., Cifuentes, L. A., Bronfman, N. C., Repetto, P. B., & Castañeda, J. V. (2024) · Progress in Disaster Science · doi:10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100343 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Disaster Preparedness among Nepalese Students Residing in Japan
St. Luke’s International University, & Bhandari, A. K. C. (2022) · Community Medicine & Public Health Care · doi:10.24966/cmph-1978/1000114 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kazemi, N., Badri, S. A., Adinehvand, E., & Rostami, K. (2022) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-022-00567-6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Çiftçi, S., & ÇİFTÇİ, L. (2024) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104939 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Zhang, E., Ding, N., Yang, L., Wang, Y., Shi, J., & Xu, Y. (2025) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-024-07073-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Crisis Response: Sendai Framework’s Hits and Misses
Zahid, L. (2025) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Science · doi:10.1007/s13753-025-00616-7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Soffer, Y., Goldberg, A., Avisar‐Shohat, G., Cohen, R., & Bar‐Dayan, Y. (2010) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01125.x
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Japan Meteorological Agency (2025). Nankai Trough Earthquake Emergency Information (Investigation Concluded). https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/press/2501/14a/NT_2501140015sv.pdf
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Atalyan, T., & Bhandary, N. P. (2026) · Natural Hazards Research · doi:10.1016/j.nhres.2026.07.004
Self-citationGammoh, L. A., Al-Lahham, Y., & Mardini, Z. (2026) · Progress in Disaster Science · doi:10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100732
- Authors
- Atalyan, T., & Bhandary, N. P.
- Affiliations
- Ehime University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Atalyan, Tatul
- Bhandary, Netra Prakash
- Venue
- Journal of Disaster Science and Management
- Published
- 2025-12-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 3005-1746 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4416893235
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Disaster Science and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
- Keywords
- earthquake preparedness, international students, disaster education, earthquake risk perception, cultural diversity, disaster risk reduction, Sendai Framework, language barriers, Ehime University
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-04.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-04.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review