Cited by 2Disaster Management and ResilienceDisaster Response and ManagementEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies

Assessing earthquake preparedness in a culturally diverse international students population: a case of Ehime university in Shikoku, Japan

Open access
Atalyan, Tatul, Bhandary, Netra Prakash·2025·Journal of Disaster Science and Management

Abstract

Introduction: International students in Japan face unique challenges in earthquake preparedness, despite the country’s globally recognized disaster management systems. This exploratory study presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first assessment of preparedness among this population using a unified, multidimensional framework. Method: Five key dimensions were evaluated: education and awareness, practical preparedness, behavioral preparedness, perceived earthquake risk and emotional response, and confidence in managing earthquake situations. A structured online survey was completed by 113 students from 29 countries. The questionnaire was developed using validated instruments and informed by established theoretical models. Result: Among all dimensions, education and awareness demonstrated the strongest association with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818). It was also significantly correlated with behavioral preparedness (ρ = 0.574), practical preparedness (ρ = 0.559), and confidence in managing earthquake situations (ρ = 0.570). However, no significant relationship was found with perceived earthquake risk and emotional response (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243). Notably, prior experience with earthquakes did not significantly influence students’ preparedness levels (U = 1416.5, p = 0.658). Qualitative feedback highlighted barriers, including a lack of localized information, language challenges, and emotional anxiety. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the need for inclusive, action-oriented disaster education tailored to international student communities. This study contributes to Priority 1 of the Sendai Framework, which emphasizes understanding disaster risk, and provides a foundation for future cross-cultural disaster risk reduction research.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This exploratory survey of 113 international students at Ehime University assessed earthquake preparedness across five dimensions and found education/awareness most strongly correlated with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818), while prior earthquake experience had no significant effect (p = 0.658). Despite higher perceived risk and education scores, practical and behavioral preparedness were lower, revealing a readiness-action gap and barriers such as lack of information, motivation, and cost.

Key findings

  • Education and awareness had the strongest positive association with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818, p < 0.001) and was also significantly correlated with behavioral preparedness (ρ = 0.574), confidence (ρ = 0.570), and practical preparedness (ρ = 0.559); it was not significantly correlated with perceived risk and emotional response (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243).
  • Prior earthquake experience did not significantly influence overall preparedness: Mann-Whitney U = 1416.5, p = 0.658, with mean ranks of 58.05 for prior experience (n = 71) and 55.23 for no prior experience (n = 42).
  • Mean scores were highest for Perceived Risk (M = 2.76), Education (M = 2.74), and Confidence (M = 2.61), but lower for Behavioral Preparedness (M = 2.37) and Practical Preparedness (M = 2.33); only 11.5% reported completing all recommended preparedness actions, while 20.4% had taken none in the past six months.
  • Reported barriers included lack of information or training (33.6%), lack of motivation (30.1%), and cost-related concerns (23.9%); 79.6% were familiar with the Earthquake Early Warning system, but only 54.0% knew the nearest evacuation point and 30.1% had a physical copy of emergency contact numbers.

Methods

  • Online survey of international students at Ehime University in Matsuyama City, Japan; all 224 international students were invited, and 113 valid responses were collected (response rate = 50.4%) from 29 countries, with no missing data.
  • The questionnaire contained 42 items (41 analyzed) covering five dimensions: education and awareness, practical preparedness, behavioral preparedness, perceived earthquake risk and emotional response, and confidence in managing earthquake situations; items were adapted from HEPI, PPDTS, and ERS and informed by EPPM and PADM.
  • Analysis used SPSS Statistics Version 29, including descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman’s rank-order correlations, Mann-Whitney U tests, and inductive thematic analysis of 20 open-ended responses.

Limitations

  • Stated: the instrument was developed for exploratory purposes and has not undergone full psychometric validation; two subscales had Cronbach’s alpha below 0.70 (Education α = 0.615; Behavioral Preparedness α = 0.632) but were retained for exploratory research.
  • Stated: the qualitative component was limited, relying on a single optional item (n = 20); the cross-sectional design limits causal inference; and the single-university setting may constrain generalizability.
  • Evident from the text: the sample is from one university and is predominantly from Asia (77.0%) and doctoral students (49.6%), and all preparedness measures are self-reported, which may limit broader generalization and introduce response biases.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s44367-025-00024-0

Cites

39 of 40 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

5 of 25 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The relationship between disaster experience and preparedness is not linear.

    “Further research has shown that the relationship between disaster experience and preparedness is not linear.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Becker et al., 2017 source
  • Premisecitation

    Emotional and cognitive readiness may not lead to protective action unless barriers such as time, resources, and personal relevance are addressed.

    “One study found that emotional and cognitive readiness may not lead to protective action unless barriers such as time, resources, and personal relevance are addressed (Gowan et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gowan et al., 2015 source

      The Discussion’s “Practicing resilience” section distinguishes readiness in thought and belief from readiness in action, while “Preventive practice and promoting readiness” emphasizes resources and personally meaningful choices. These passages support the general point that awareness alone is not action, but they do not identify lack of time as a barrier or report a study finding that addressing those barriers leads to protective action (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    A structured online survey was completed by 113 international students from 29 countries.

    “A structured online survey was completed by 113 students from 29 countries.”
    • Also stated in: § Participant characteristics · plain
      “The final sample consisted of 113 international students from 29 countries, which highlights a diverse global representation at Ehime University.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • Findingown data

    Among all dimensions, education and awareness demonstrated the strongest association with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818).

    “Among all dimensions, education and awareness demonstrated the strongest association with overall preparedness (ρ = 0.818).”
    • Also stated in: § Correlation between preparedness dimensions and overall preparedness · plain
      “The strongest correlation was observed for Education, followed by Behavioral Preparedness, Practical Preparedness, and Confidence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • Findingown data

    Education and awareness was significantly correlated with confidence in managing earthquake situations (ρ = 0.570).

    “It was also significantly correlated with behavioral preparedness (ρ = 0.574), practical preparedness (ρ = 0.559), and confidence in managing earthquake situations (ρ = 0.570).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims. 32
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    International students in Japan face distinct vulnerabilities and challenges including limited disaster knowledge, low levels of practical preparedness, emotional stress, and reliance on peer networks for information and support.

    “These concerns are reinforced by recent studies that identify a range of challenges faced by international students in Japan, including limited disaster knowledge, low levels of practical preparedness, emotional stress, and reliance on peer networks for information and support (Bhandari, 2022;Gómez, 2013;Iizuka, 2022;Koike et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bhandari, 2022 source
    • cites Gómez, 2013 source

      Sections 4.2.4 and 5.2 report reliance on friends of the same nationality for information and emotional support; section 5.1 describes anxiety and other stresses after the earthquake. Sections 4.6.2 and 5.1 identify gaps in applying training and in preparation for the days after the tremors, but do not establish generally limited disaster knowledge or low practical preparedness: 71% of surveyed students had received earthquake training. The findings concern engineering students at Tohoku University, not international students throughout Japan. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Iizuka, 2022 source

      The Introduction reports limited disaster knowledge and reliance on family and same-nationality friends for information. Section 3.2 documents disaster-related anxiety, but finds it was generally greater among Japanese students. Sections 3.3 and 4.4 find that international students made more preparations than comparable Japanese students, contrary to the implication that they had especially low practical preparedness; reliance on peers for support, beyond information, is not established. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Prior experience may enhance, reduce, or have no effect on preparedness, depending on how individuals interpret and internalize that experience.

    “Prior experience may enhance, reduce, or have no effect on preparedness, depending on how individuals interpret and internalize that experience (Becker et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Becker et al., 2017 source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    No significant relationship was found between education and awareness and perceived earthquake risk and emotional response (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243).

    “However, no significant relationship was found with perceived earthquake risk and emotional response (ρ = 0.111, p = 0.243).”
    • Also stated in: § Relationships between education and other preparedness dimensions · plain
      “No significant correlation was observed between Education and Perceived Risk, as summarized in Table 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In total, 113 valid responses were collected (response rate = 50.4%), with no missing data.

    “In total, 113 valid responses were collected (response rate = 50.4%),with no missing data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Coping strategies for managing earthquake-related anxiety included talking with friends or family (43.4%), seeking information and reassurance from official sources (40.7%), and mentally rehearsing preparedness actions (33.6%).

    “Coping strategies for managing earthquake-related anxiety included talking with friends or family (43.4%),seeking information and reassurance from official sources (40.7%), and mentally rehearsing preparedness actions (33.6%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most frequently selected barriers to preparedness were a lack of information or training (33.6%), a lack of motivation (30.1%), and cost-related concerns (23.9%).

    “The most frequently selected barriers were a lack of information or training (33.6%), a lack of motivation (30.1%), and cost-related concerns, such as the expense of emergency kits and supplies (23.9%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Most respondents were between 23 and 27 years of age (32.7%).

    “Most respondents were between 23 and 27 years of age (32.7%), followed by 23.9% between 28 and 32 years, 17.7% between 33 and 37 years, and 15% between 18 and 22 years, while a smaller proportion (10.6%) was 38 years or older (Fig. 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only 30.1% of participants reported having a physical copy of emergency contact numbers in their emergency kit or wallet, while 69.9% did not.

    “In contrast, only 30.1% of participants reported having a physical copy of emergency contact numbers (e.g., embassy, family, or local services) in their emergency kit or wallet, while 69.9% did not have anything like this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Other reported barriers included time constraints (22.1%) and low perceived necessity (15.0%).

    “Other reported barriers included time constraints (22.1%) and low perceived necessity (15.0%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    79.6% of participants reported familiarity with the Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) alarm alert in Japan, while 20.4% were not familiar with the system.

    “Regarding the Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) alarm alert in Japan, 79.6% of participants reported familiarity with the warning, while 20.4% were not familiar with the system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The majority of participants were from Asia (77.0%), followed by Africa (17.7%), Europe (3.5%), and the Americas (1.8%).

    “In terms of continental distribution, the majority were from Asia (77.0%), followed by Africa (17.7%),Europe (3.5%), and the Americas (1.8%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    62.8% of respondents (n = 71) reported having experienced an earthquake prior to arriving in Japan, while 37.2% (n = 42) had not.

    “In terms of earthquake experience, 62.8% of the respondents (n = 71) reported to have experienced an earthquake prior to arriving in Japan while 37.2% (n = 42) have not”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some participants reported limited awareness of earthquake preparedness upon arriving in Japan and emphasized the need for clearer orientation.

    “Some participants reported limited awareness of earthquake preparedness upon arriving in Japan and emphasized the need for clearer orientation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants expressed interest in receiving regular training and clearer announcements regarding earthquake drills.

    “Participants expressed interest in receiving regular training and clearer announcements regarding earthquake drills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most common countries of origin were China (20.4%), Indonesia (15.0%), and Nepal (10.6%).

    “The most common countries of origin were China (20.4%),Indonesia (15.0%), and Nepal (10.6%), characterized by high seismic hazard.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The open-ended question received 20 responses, which were manually reviewed and thematically categorized into four key themes.

    “A total of 20 responses were received, manually reviewed, and thematically categorized.Four key themes emerged, illustrated with representative quotations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Education was significantly associated with behavioral preparedness, confidence, and practical readiness.

    “Education emerged as the strongest correlation of overall preparedness and was also significantly associated with behavioral preparedness, confidence, and practical readiness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The strongest correlation with overall preparedness was observed for Education, followed by Behavioral Preparedness, Practical Preparedness, and Confidence; Perceived Risk showed a more moderate correlation.

    “The strongest correlation was observed for Education, followed by Behavioral Preparedness, Practical Preparedness, and Confidence.In contrast, Perceived Risk showed a more moderate correlation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A small set of open-ended responses (n = 20) provided supplementary qualitative context, offering additional insights into perceived barriers and preparedness challenges.

    “A small set of open-ended responses (n = 20) provided supplementary qualitative context, offering additional insights into perceived barriers and preparedness challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fewer participants reported receiving education on communication plans (23.9%) or psychological coping strategies (8.0%).

    “Fewer participants reported receiving education on communication plans (23.9%) or psychological coping strategies (8.0%) (Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The dataset was complete with no missing values, as all items were mandatory.

    “The dataset was complete with no missing values, as all items were mandatory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    As of June 2024, Japan hosted approximately 3.6 million foreign residents, among whom over 368,000 were international students.

    “As of June 2024, Japan hosted approximately 3.6 million foreign residents, among whom over 368,000 were international students (Immigration Services Agency of Japan, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Immigration Services Agency of Japan, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Most prior studies have focused primarily on specific aspects of preparedness, such as knowledge or behavior, in isolation.

    “First, most prior studies have focused primarily on specific aspects of preparedness, such as knowledge or behavior, in isolation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Government projections warn of a worst-case nationwide disaster with 298,000 deaths (tsunami: 215,000 and building collapse: 73,000) during nighttime winter conditions with limited evacuation response.

    “In this earthquake, the government projections warn of a worstcase nationwide disaster with 298,000 deaths (tsunami: 215,000 and building collapse: 73,000) during nighttime winter conditions with limited evacuation response (Cabinet Office, Government of Japan 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cabinet Office, Government of Japan 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The questionnaire was developed using validated instruments and informed by established theoretical models.

    “The questionnaire was developed using validated instruments and informed by established theoretical models.”
    • Also stated in: § Conceptual foundation · plain
      “The questionnaire was developed through a multi-source design strategy that combined validated instruments and theoretical frameworks to ensure conceptual rigor and coverage of diverse preparedness dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    International students remain underrepresented in preparedness research.

    “Second, although international students represent a growing and highly diverse demographic element in Japan, they remain underrepresented in preparedness research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As of November 30, 2024, Ehime University hosted 224 international students.

    “As of November 30, 2024, Ehime University hosted 224 international students (Ehime University, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ehime University, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Additional items were developed based on key constructs from the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) and the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM).

    “Additional items were developed based on key constructs from theoretical frameworks such as the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) (Witte, 1992) and the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM) (Lindell & Perry, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Witte, 1992 source
    • cites Lindell & Perry, 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Matsuyama City is situated near the Median Tectonic Line and within a zone predicted to experience intensity 6+ during a potential Nankai Trough earthquake.

    “Matsuyama City, situated near the Median Tectonic Line and within a zone predicted to experience intensity 6 + predicted intensity of shaking (Japan Meteorological Agency intensity level) during a potential Nankai Trough earthquake, provides a valuable non-metropolitan context for examining earthquake preparedness beyond Japan's major urban centers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Japan Meteorological Agency

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The risk of a major earthquake remains severe, especially from the anticipated Nankai Trough Earthquake, predicted to hit most of western Japan.

    “Nevertheless, the risk of a major earthquake remains severe, especially from the anticipated Nankai Trough Earthquake, predicted to hit most of western Japan.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The probability of occurrence of the Nankai Trough Earthquake is estimated to be 70%-80% within the next 30 years.

    “According to the 2025 government report, Japan's Earthquake Research Committee has estimated the probability of occurrence of the Nankai Trough Earthquake to be 70%-80% within the next 30 years (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Japan Meteorological Agency, 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The single-university setting may constrain generalizability.

    “In addition, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the single-university setting may constrain generalizability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Individuals who participated in disaster education through printed materials, public meetings, or broadcasts demonstrated significantly higher levels of overall earthquake readiness.

    “For example, individuals who participated in disaster education through printed materials, public meetings, or broadcasts demonstrated significantly higher levels of overall earthquake readiness (Tanaka, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tanaka, 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Participants with greater earthquake-related knowledge tended to report more proactive behaviors, higher confidence, and greater engagement in practical preparedness measures.

    “suggesting that participants with greater earthquake-related knowledge also tended to report more proactive behaviors, higher confidence, and greater engagement in practical preparedness measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    For international students, prior experience in their home countries may not directly translate into readiness in Japan, where disaster expectations, infrastructure, and communication systems differ significantly.

    “For international students, prior experience in their home countries may not directly translate into readiness in Japan, where disaster expectations, infrastructure, and communication systems differ significantly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was grounded in established theoretical frameworks and built upon previously validated preparedness constructs.

    “Methodologically, the study was grounded in established theoretical frameworks and built upon previously validated preparedness constructs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The cross-sectional design limits causal inference.

    “In addition, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the single-university setting may constrain generalizability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Japan's Earthquake Early Warning system, multilingual signage, and institutionalized drills require localized understanding and support, which prior experience alone cannot provide.

    “Japan's Earthquake Early Warning system, multilingual signage, and institutionalized drills require localized understanding and support, which prior experience alone cannot provide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior earthquake experience influenced teenagers' risk perception but did not necessarily lead to greater preparedness.

    “Similarly, although prior earthquake experience influenced teenagers' risk perception, it did not necessarily lead to greater preparedness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kazemi et al., 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    One item (Q27) was removed from the Behavioral Preparedness subscale after preliminary inspection due to a low item-total correlation.

    “One item (Q27) was removed from the Behavioral Preparedness subscale after preliminary inspection due to a low item-total correlation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    There is a readiness-action gap: despite relatively high scores in Perceived Risk, Education, and Confidence, participants reported lower levels of Practical Preparedness and Behavioral Preparedness.

    “Despite relatively high scores in Perceived Risk (M = 2.76), Education (M = 2.74), and Confidence (M = 2.61), participants reported lower levels of Practical Preparedness (M = 2.33) and Behavioral Preparedness (M = 2.37).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Education and Behavioral Preparedness subscales yielded Cronbach's alpha values below the conventional 0.70 threshold, but were retained based on accepted standards for exploratory research (Hair et al., 2010).

    “(Education and Behavioral Preparedness) yielded Cronbach's alpha values below the conventional 0.70 threshold, but were retained based on accepted standards for exploratory research (Hair et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hair et al., 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Attention to and comprehension of hazard information has been found to be significantly associated with preparedness intentions through these same mechanisms (Li et al., 2024).

    “Attention to and comprehension of hazard information has also been found to be significantly associated with preparedness intentions through these same mechanisms (Li et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li et al., 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    There is a gap between national-level awareness and localized, actionable preparedness, indicating that broad communication campaigns alone are insufficient for achieving effective disaster readiness.

    “This points to a gap between national-level awareness and localized, actionable preparedness, indicating that broad communication campaigns alone are insufficient for achieving effective disaster readiness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The qualitative component was limited in scope and depth, relying on a single optional item.

    “The qualitative component was limited in scope and depth, relying on a single optional item.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recent research suggests that experiencing low to moderate magnitude earthquakes did not significantly enhance individuals' perception of earthquake occurrence (Zhang et al., 2025).

    “Recent research suggests that experiencing low to moderate magnitude earthquakes did not significantly enhance individuals' perception of earthquake occurrence (Zhang et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Few prior studies have analyzed these specific preparedness dimensions within a unified model.

    “While this study statistically compared multiple preparedness components, few prior studies have analyzed these specific dimensions within a unified model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The instrument was developed for exploratory purposes and has not yet undergone full psychometric validation.

    “Although the preparedness dimensions were grounded in established frameworks, the instrument was developed for exploratory purposes and has not yet undergone full psychometric validation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Cultural bias such as hierarchism, shaped by social surroundings, played a more influential role in shaping teenagers' risk-related attitudes.

    “Instead, cultural bias such as hierarchism, shaped by social surroundings, played a more influential role in shaping their risk-related attitudes.(Kazemi et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kazemi et al., 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Existing literature consistently emphasizes the central role of disaster education.

    “However, existing literature consistently emphasizes the central role of disaster education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The structured quantitative design allowed for the identification of the most influential preparedness dimension and facilitated a broader examination of how this key factor relates to other components of readiness.

    “Its structured quantitative design allowed for the identification of the most influential preparedness dimension and facilitated a broader examination of how this key factor relates to other components of readiness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    In accordance with institutional policies and established guidelines for low-risk social science research, formal approval from an ethics committee was not required or sought.

    “In accordance with institutional policies and established guidelines for low-risk social science research, formal approval from an ethics committee was not required or sought.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
52 of 52
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-reported survey responses accurately reflect participants' actual earthquake preparedness knowledge, behaviors, and confidence.

    “A structured online survey was completed by 113 students from 29 countries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 113 respondents are representative of the international student population at Ehime University such that findings can be interpreted for that population.

    “In total, 113 valid responses were collected (response rate = 50.4%),with no missing data.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • A described Yes/No item includes an unsure response

    Minor

    The shelter-location item is introduced as binary, but its reported responses include a third category, "unsure."

  • All items are called mandatory, but one is called optional

    Minor

    The methods say all survey items were mandatory, whereas the limitations describe a single optional qualitative item.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  2. Japan Meteorological Agency (2025). Nankai Trough Earthquake Emergency Information (Investigation Concluded). https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/press/2501/14a/NT_2501140015sv.pdf

Authors
Atalyan, T., & Bhandary, N. P.
Affiliations
Ehime University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Atalyan, Tatul
  • Bhandary, Netra Prakash
Venue
Journal of Disaster Science and Management
Published
2025-12-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
3005-1746 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416893235
Cited by
2
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Disaster Science and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Keywords
earthquake preparedness, international students, disaster education, earthquake risk perception, cultural diversity, disaster risk reduction, Sendai Framework, language barriers, Ehime University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-04.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-04.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review