The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts
Open accessAbstract
Worldwide, there is a need to enhance our understanding of vulnerability and to develop methodologies and tools to assess vulnerability. One of the most important goals of assessing coastal flood vulnerability, in particular, is to create a readily understandable link between the theoretical concepts of flood vulnerability and the day-to-day decision-making process and to encapsulate this link in an easily accessible tool. This article focuses on developing a Coastal City Flood Vulnerability Index (CCFVI) based on exposure, susceptibility and resilience to coastal flooding. It is applied to nine cities around the world, each with different kinds of exposure. With the aid of this index, it is demonstrated which cities are most vulnerable to coastal flooding with regard to the system’s components, that is, hydro-geological, socio-economic and politico-administrative. The index gives a number from 0 to 1, indicating comparatively low or high coastal flood vulnerability, which shows which cities are most in need of further, more detailed investigation for decision-makers. Once its use to compare the vulnerability of a range of cities under current conditions has been demonstrated, it is used to study the impact of climate change on the vulnerability of these cities over a longer timescale. The results show that CCFVI provides a means of obtaining a broad overview of flood vulnerability and the effect of possible adaptation options. This, in turn, will allow for the direction of resources to more in-depth investigation of the most promising strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adger, W. N. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 · Cited by 5,417
The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems
Harley, C. D. G., Randall Hughes, A., Hultgren, K. M., Miner, B. G., Sorte, C. J. B., Thornber, C. S., Rodriguez, L. F., Tomanek, L., & Williams, S. L. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00871.x · Cited by 2,700
Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century
DeFries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M., & Hansen, M. (2010) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo756 · Cited by 1,413
Cited by
Ghosh, A., & Kar, S. K. (2018) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-018-3392-y · Cited by 298
Tapia, C., Abajo, B., Feliu, E., Mendizabal, M., Martinez, J. A., Fernández, J. G., Laburu, T., & Lejarazu, A. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.040 · Cited by 238
Flood disaster risk mapping in the Lower Mono River Basin in Togo, West Africa
Ntajal, J., Lamptey, B. L., Mahamadou, I. B., & Nyarko, B. K. (2017) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.015 · Cited by 135
Park, S.-J., & Lee, D.-K. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aba5b3 · Cited by 100
Ogie, R. I., Holderness, T., Dunn, S., & Turpin, E. (2018) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.11.004 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Balica, S. F., Wright, N. G., & van der Meulen, F.
- Venue
- Natural Hazards
- Published
- 2012-06-16
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-105
- ISSN
- 0921-030X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0840
- OpenAlex
- W1996781828
- Cited by
- 792
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11069-012-0234-1
- The paper
- Balica, S. F., Wright, N. G., & van der Meulen, F. (2012). A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0234-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.