Cited by 238Disaster Management and ResilienceSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change and Sustainable Development

Profiling urban vulnerabilities to climate change: an indicator-based vulnerability assessment for European cities

Tapia, Carlos, Abajo, Beñat, Feliu, Efren, Mendizabal, Maddalen, Martinez, José Antonio, Fernández, J. German, Laburu, Txomin, Lejarazu, Adelaida·2017·Ecological Indicators

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.040

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding differential vulnerabilities to climate change in urban contexts is timely because cities house the majority of the world's population and because a changing climate poses threats to high numbers of urban residents, affecting basic infrastructures, networks and services, as well as economic and health systems.

    “The understanding of differential vulnerabilities to climate change in urban contexts is timely not only because cities house the majority of the world's population, but also because a changing climate poses threats to high numbers of urban residents, affecting basic infrastructures, networks and services, as well as economic and health systems (Tapia et al., 2017).”
  • Despite a growing body of work on adaptation strategies to address differential vulnerabilities, research is yet to elucidate how adaptation projects can redress pre-existing and intersecting drivers of differential vulnerability in urban contexts, with a few exceptions.

    “Despite a growing body of work on adaptation strategies to address differential vulnerabilities (Berrouet et al., 2017;Soares et al., 2012;Tapia et al., 2017), research is yet to elucidate how adaptation projects can redress pre-existing and intersecting drivers of differential vulnerability in urban contexts, with a few exceptions (e.g., Chang et al., 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tapia, C., Abajo, B., Feliu, E., Mendizabal, M., Martinez, J. A., Fernández, J. G., Laburu, T., & Lejarazu, A.
Affiliations
Euskadiko Parke Teknologikoa (ES)
Corresponding author
Tapia, Carlos
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
78
Pages
142-155
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2597007571
Cited by
238
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
FWCI
42.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
  • TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Union's Seventh Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration (308497)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
Keywords
urban vulnerability, climate change impacts, vulnerability assessment, European cities, heat waves, human health, drought, water resources planning, floods, pluvial flooding, river flooding, coastal flooding, urban adaptation, Urban Audit, socio-economic impacts, urban fabric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review