Cited by 35Disaster Management and ResilienceInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisFlood Risk Assessment and Management

Implementation of an integrated vulnerability and risk assessment model

Lummen, Natainia S., Yamada, Fumihiko·2014·Natural Hazards

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11069-014-1123-6

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lummen, N. S., & Yamada, F.
Affiliations
Kumamoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Lummen, Natainia S.
Venue
Natural Hazards
Published
2014-03-18
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
1085-1117
ISSN
  • 0921-030X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0840
OpenAlex
W2000615833
Cited by
34
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Natural Hazards (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Keywords
composite index, exposure, hazards, vulnerability, risk mitigation, decision support, vulnerability mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review