CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variations in population vulnerability to tectonic and landslide-related tsunami hazards in Alaska

Wood, Nathan J., Peters, Jeff·2015·Natural Hazards
DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1399-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11069-014-1399-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Regional map showing community locations and maps of modeled pedestrian evacuation travel times in Cordova, Kodiak, Seward, Valdez, and Whittier (Alaska, USA) relative to maximum tsunami hazard zones and assuming a slow walking speed of 1.1 m/s. Map extents for each community vary considerably and are based on the extent of resident and employee locations within a community
Fig. 1 Regional map showing community locations and maps of modeled pedestrian evacuation travel times in Cordova, Kodiak, Seward, Valdez, and Whittier (Alaska, USA) relative to maximum tsunami hazard zones and assuming a slow walking speed of 1.1 m/s. Map extents for each community vary considerably and are based on the extent of resident and employee locations within a communityCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Number of a residents and employees and b businesses in maximum tsunami hazard zones as a function of modeled pedestrian travel time to reach the boundary of a tsunami hazard zone, assuming a slow walking speed
Fig. 2 Number of a residents and employees and b businesses in maximum tsunami hazard zones as a function of modeled pedestrian travel time to reach the boundary of a tsunami hazard zone, assuming a slow walking speedCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Estimated ratios of employees to residents and customers to residents in Cordova, Kodiak, Seward, and Whittier, Alaska, based on employee populations and an assumption of 20 customers at certain types of businesses in maximum and landslide-related tsunami hazard zones
Fig. 3 Estimated ratios of employees to residents and customers to residents in Cordova, Kodiak, Seward, and Whittier, Alaska, based on employee populations and an assumption of 20 customers at certain types of businesses in maximum and landslide-related tsunami hazard zonesCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Maps of modeled pedestrian evacuation travel times to reach the boundary of tsunami hazard zones in Seward, Valdez, and Whittier (Alaska, USA) relative to landslide-related tsunami hazard zones and assuming a slow walking speed of 1.1 m/s. Map extents for each community vary considerably and are based on the extent of resident and employee locations within the hazard zone of a community. Colors for travel times are based on estimated wave arrival times, which is different in Valdez (2 min) from Seward and Whittier (1 min)
Fig. 4 Maps of modeled pedestrian evacuation travel times to reach the boundary of tsunami hazard zones in Seward, Valdez, and Whittier (Alaska, USA) relative to landslide-related tsunami hazard zones and assuming a slow walking speed of 1.1 m/s. Map extents for each community vary considerably and are based on the extent of resident and employee locations within the hazard zone of a community. Colors for travel times are based on estimated wave arrival times, which is different in Valdez (2 min) from Seward and Whittier (1 min)CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 5 Number of residents and employees in landslide-generated tsunami hazard zones as a function of modeled pedestrian travel time to reach the boundary of a tsunami hazard zone, assuming a slow walking speed
Fig. 5 Number of residents and employees in landslide-generated tsunami hazard zones as a function of modeled pedestrian travel time to reach the boundary of a tsunami hazard zone, assuming a slow walking speedCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 6 Maps of modeled pedestrian evacuation travel times along the waterfront and on the docks of the case study communities, assuming a slow walking speed of 1.1 m/s and landslide-related tsunami hazard zones in a Seward, b Whittier, and c Valdez, Alaska and maximum tsunami hazard zones in d Cordova and e Kodiak, Alaska
Fig. 6 Maps of modeled pedestrian evacuation travel times along the waterfront and on the docks of the case study communities, assuming a slow walking speed of 1.1 m/s and landslide-related tsunami hazard zones in a Seward, b Whittier, and c Valdez, Alaska and maximum tsunami hazard zones in d Cordova and e Kodiak, AlaskaCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 7 Estimated total number of residents or employees in maximum or landslide-related tsunami hazard zones compared to the number of residents or employees in these zones in places where modeled travel time to reach the boundary of the hazard zone is greater than predicted wave arrival time. Arrival times are based on the considered scenarios and on modeling assumptions; however, future tsunamis may exhibit different characteristics and smaller waves may arrive sooner than modeled
Fig. 7 Estimated total number of residents or employees in maximum or landslide-related tsunami hazard zones compared to the number of residents or employees in these zones in places where modeled travel time to reach the boundary of the hazard zone is greater than predicted wave arrival time. Arrival times are based on the considered scenarios and on modeling assumptions; however, future tsunamis may exhibit different characteristics and smaller waves may arrive sooner than modeledCC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Coulter H, Migliaccio R (1966) Effects of the earthquake of March 27, 1964 at Valdez, Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 542-C. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC · DOI
  2. Freire S, Aubrecht C, Wegscheider S (2013) Advancing tsunami risk assessment by improving spatio-temporal population exposure and evacuation modeling. Nat Hazards 68:1311–1324 · DOI
  3. Grantz A, Plafker G, Kachadoorian R (1964) Alaska’s Good Friday Earthquake, March 27, 1964, a preliminary geologic evaluation, Geological Survey Circular 491, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC · DOI
  4. Hansen W, Eckel E, Schaem W, Lyle R, George W, Chance G (1966) The Alaska Earthquake March 27, 1964—field investigations and reconstruction effort, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 541. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC · DOI
  5. Hubbard T, Wolken G, Stevens D, Combellick R (2013) High-resolution lidar data for the Whittier area, Passage Canal, and Portage Lake, Alaska, in DGGS Staff, LiDAR Datasets of Alaska. Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Raw Data File 2013-3, 5 p. doi: 10.14509/24976 · DOI
  6. Jonkmann S, Vrijling J, Vrouwenvelder A (2008) Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods: a literature review and a proposal for a new method. Nat Hazards 46:353–389 · DOI
  7. Lemke R (1967) Effects of the earthquake of March 27, 1964, at Seward, Alaska. Geological Survey Professional Paper 542-E. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC · DOI
  8. Lovholt F, Glimsdal S, Harbitz C, Zamora N, Nadim F, Peduzzi P, Dao H, Smebye H (2012) Tsunami hazard and exposure on the global scale. Earth Sci Rev 110(1–4):58–73 · DOI
  9. National Research Council (2011) Tsunami warning and preparedness: an assessment of the US Tsunami Program and the Nation’s preparedness efforts, Committee on the review of the tsunami warning and forecast system and overview of the nation’s tsunami preparedness. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
  10. Nicolsky D, Suleimani E, Combellick R, Hansen R (2011) Tsunami inundation maps of Whittier and western Passage Canal, Alaska. Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Report of Investigation 2011-7, 65 p · DOI
  11. Nicolsky D, Suleimani E, Haeussler P, Ryan H, Koehler R, Combellick R, Hansen R (2013) Tsunami inundation maps of Port Valdez, Alaska. Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Report of Investigation 2013-1, 77 p, 1 sheet, scale 1:12,500 · DOI
  12. Nicolsky D, Suleimani E, Koehler R (2014) Tsunami inundation maps of Cordova and Tatitlek, Alaska. Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Report of Investigation 2014-1, 49 p · DOI
  13. Park S, van de Lindt J, Gupta R, Cox D (2012) Method to determine the locations of tsunami vertical evacuation shelters. Nat Hazard 63:891–908 · DOI
  14. Post J, Wegscheider S, Muck M, Zosseder K, Kiefl R, Steinmetz T, Strunz G (2009) Assessment of human immediate response capability related to tsunami threats in Indonesia at a sub-national scale. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1075–1086 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Rogers G (1970) Economic effects of the earthquake. The great Alaska earthquake of 1964—human ecology. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp 58–76
  16. Suleimani E, Hansen R, Combellick R, Carver G (2002) Tsunami hazard maps of the Kodiak area, Alaska. Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Report of Investigation 2002-1, 16 p, 4 sheets, scale 1:12,500 · DOI
  17. Suleimani E, Nicolsky D, West D, Combellick R, Hansen R (2010) Tsunami inundation maps of Seward and northern Resurrection Bay, Alaska. Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Report of Investigation 2010-1, 47 p, 3 sheets, scale 1:12,500 · DOI
  18. Wilson R, Barberopoulou A, Miller K, Goltz J, Synolakis C (2008) New maximum tsunami inundation maps for use by local emergency planners in the State of California, USA: EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, v. 89, no. 53, Fall Meeting Supplement, Abstract OS43D-1343
  19. Wood N (2007) Variations in community exposure and sensitivity to tsunami hazards in Oregon. Reston, Va., USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5283, 43 p · DOI
  20. Wood N, Good J (2005) Perceptions of earthquake and tsunami issues in U.S. Pacific Northwest port and harbor communities. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 23(3):103–138 · DOI
  21. Wood N, Schmidtlein M (2013) Community variations in population exposure to near-field tsunami hazards as a function of pedestrian travel time to safety. Nat Hazards 65(3):1603–1628 · DOI
  22. Wood N, Burton C, Cutter S (2010) Community variations in social vulnerability to Cascadia-related tsunamis in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Nat Hazards 52(2):369–389 · DOI
  23. Wood N, Jones J, Schelling J, Schmidtlein M (2014) Tsunami vertical-evacuation planning in the U.S. Pacific Northwest as a geospatial, multi-criteria decision problem. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 9:68–83 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Wood, N. J., & Peters, J.
Venue
Natural Hazards
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-09-07
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
1811-1831
ISSN
  • 0921-030X
  • 1573-0840
DOI
10.1007/s11069-014-1399-6
Cited by
14
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review