Cited by 13Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems

A new fault tolerant strategy using adaptive time delay estimation for robot manipulators with actuator faults

Xia, Yongling, Liu, Yanbin, Sun, Weichao·2025·Nonlinear Dynamics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11071-024-10751-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, Y., Liu, Y., & Sun, W.
Affiliations
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Yanbin
Venue
Nonlinear Dynamics
Published
2025-01-06
Volume
113
Issue
8
Pages
8769-8781
ISSN
  • 0924-090X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-269X
OpenAlex
W4406099958
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 1
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nonlinear Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Keywords
fault-tolerant control, robot manipulators, actuator faults, time delay estimation, adaptive control, trajectory tracking, error feedback, model uncertainty, closed-loop stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review