The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · cited 1×
“as exploration and exploitation (March 1991), as a conflict between engineering and ecological resilience (Holling 1996), as requirements of long-term planning and short-term acceptance (Grunwald 2000), or as the efficacy paradox of governance under conditions of complexity (Voß et al.”
BackgroundGeels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change
Pierson, P. (1993) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2950710 · Cited by 2,600
Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution
Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00009-6 · Cited by 2,357
The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis
Wildavsky, A. (1979) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-04955-4 · Cited by 896
Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state
Meadowcroft, J. (2005) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563460500344419 · Cited by 179
Cited by
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability
Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 · Cited by 1,712
Self-citationSustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 · Cited by 1,401
Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective
Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2015.1112259 · Cited by 838
Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources
Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L. (2012) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001 · Cited by 708
Metadata
- Authors
- Voß, J.-P., Smith, A., & Grin, J.
- Venue
- Policy Sciences
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 275-302
- ISSN
- 0032-2687 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0891
- OpenAlex
- W2142130708
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 15.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5
- The paper
- Voß, J.-P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
