The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 13,723
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · Cited by 3,763
Self-citationThe Social Construction of Technological Systems
Westrum, R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019001010 · Cited by 3,368
Unruh, G. C. (2000) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00070-7 · Cited by 3,304
The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms
Geels, F. W. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 · Cited by 3,092
Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests
Scott, W. R. (2008) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · Cited by 2,933
Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537329808524310 · Cited by 2,860
Cited by
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
Self-citationBarriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU)
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · Cited by 1,903
Geels, F. W. (2019) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009 · Cited by 949
Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective
Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2015.1112259 · Cited by 838
Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003 · Cited by 627
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 991-998
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069488217
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 18.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001
- The paper
- Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L. (2012). Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
