Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Formulation and Pharmacokinetics of Self-Assembled Rifampicin Nanoparticle Systems for Pulmonary Delivery

Open access
Sung, Jean C., Padilla, Danielle J., Garcia-Contreras, Lucila, VerBerkmoes, Jarod L., Durbin, David, Peloquin, Charles A., Elbert, Katharina J., Hickey, Anthony J., Edwards, David A.·2009·Pharmaceutical Research

Abstract

PurposeTo formulate rifampicin, an anti-tuberculosis antibiotic, for aerosol delivery in a dry powder ‘porous nanoparticle-aggregate particle’ (PNAP) form suited for shelf stability, effective dispersibility and extended release with local lung and systemic drug delivery.MethodsRifampicin was encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles by a solvent evaporation process, spray dried into PNAPs containing varying amounts of nanoparticles, and characterized for physical and aerosol properties. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with formulations delivered to guinea pigs by intratracheal insufflation and compared to oral and intravenous delivery of rifampicin.ResultsThe PNAP formulations possessed properties suitable for efficient deposition in the lungs. In vitro release showed an initial burst of rifampicin, with the remainder available for release beyond eight hours. PNAPs delivered to guinea pigs by insufflation achieved systemic levels of rifampicin detected for six to eight hours. Moreover, rifampicin concentrations remained detectable in lung tissue and cells up to and beyond eight hours. Conversely, after pulmonary delivery of an aerosol without nanoparticles, rifampicin could not be detected in the lungs at eight hours.ConclusionsOur results indicate that rifampicin can be formulated into an aggregated nanoparticle form that, once delivered to animals, achieves systemic exposure and extends levels of drug in the lungs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11095-009-9894-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Sung, J. C., Padilla, D. J., Garcia-Contreras, L., VerBerkmoes, J. L., Durbin, D., Peloquin, C. A., Elbert, K. J., Hickey, A. J., & Edwards, D. A.
Venue
Pharmaceutical Research
Published
2009-04-30
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1847-1855
ISSN
  • 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-904X
OpenAlex
W1969474451
Cited by
244
References
4
FWCI
16.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formulation and Pharmacokinetics of Self-Assembled Rifampicin Nanoparticle Systems for Pulmonary Delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11095-009-9894-2
The paper
Sung, J. C., Padilla, D. J., Garcia-Contreras, L., VerBerkmoes, J. L., Durbin, D., Peloquin, C. A., Elbert, K. J., Hickey, A. J., & Edwards, D. A. (2009). Formulation and Pharmacokinetics of Self-Assembled Rifampicin Nanoparticle Systems for Pulmonary Delivery. Pharmaceutical Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-009-9894-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.