CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Medication Adherence and ComplianceSurvey Methodology and NonresponsePharmacy and Medical Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

“Patients don’t lie”; a view on adherence in asthma

Møldrup, Claus, Stein, Jonathan, Søndergaard, Birthe·2010·Pharmacy World & Science
DOI 10.1007/s11096-010-9439-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective The primary objective of this article is to examine the extent of self-reported non-adherence among patients participating in a controlled trial of an asthma compliance optimization intervention. The secondary objective is to introduce a two-question questionnaire that is, in wording and design, a neutral tool for disclosure of non-adherence behaviour. Method Data in this study was obtained as part of a controlled trial on an SMS monitoring and compliance intervention developed for Danish asthma patients. The trial was conducted from November 2007 to May 2008. A total of 244 patients participated in the study. Two new designed nonadherence questions were asked in immediate succession. This practice, along with the wording of the questions and use of the Web as medium, constitute a new approach to self-reported adherence assessment. Results A total of 43.9% of the participants in the trial reported non-adherence to the medical dosage regime for which they had, only one question earlier, documented their awareness. Conclusion This illustrates that at least 43.9% of the participants in the trial dared to report nonadherence to asthma medication.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11096-010-9439-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Mullen PD. Compliance becomes concordance. BMJ. 1997;314(7082):691–692. · DOI
  2. Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A. What do we mean by adherence to treatment and advice for living with diabetes? A review of the literature on definitions and measurements. Diabet Med. 2006;23(7):720–8. · DOI
  3. Chatterjee JS. From compliance to concordance in diabetes. J Med Ethics. 2006;32(9):507–10. · DOI
  4. Cohen SM. Concept analysis of adherence in the context of cardiovascular risk reduction. Nurs Forum. 2009;44(1):25–36. · DOI
  5. Bissonnette JM. Adherence: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2008;63(6):634–43. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Sabate E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
  7. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(5):487–97. · DOI · Paper page
  8. DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care. 2004;42(3):200–9. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1218–24. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Horne R, Weinman J, Barber N, Elliot R, Morgan M. Concordance, adherence and compliance in medicine taking. London: NHS SDO; 2005.
  11. Glintborg B, Hillestrom PR, Olsen LH, Dalhoff KP, Poulsen HE. Are patients reliable when self-reporting medication use? Validation of structured drug interviews and home visits by drug analysis and prescription data in acutely hospitalized patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;47(11):1440–9. · DOI
  12. Svarstad BL. Measuring adherence in community pharmacies: opportunities and challenges. J Am Pharm Assoc 2005;45(2):127–129. · DOI
  13. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(5):487–97. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Glass TR, De GS, Hirschel B, Battegay M, Furrer H, Covassini M, et al. Self-reported non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy repeatedly assessed by two questions predicts treatment failure in virologically suppressed patients. Antivir Ther. 2008;13(1):77–85. · DOI
  15. Munoz-Moreno JA, Fumaz CR, Ferrer MJ, Tuldra A, Rovira T, Viladrich C, et al. Assessing self-reported adherence to HIV therapy by questionnaire: the SERAD (Self-Reported Adherence) Study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007;23(10):1166–75. · DOI
  16. Liu H, Miller LG, Hays RD, Wagner G, Golin CE, Hu W, et al. A practical method to calibrate self-reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43(Suppl 1):S104–12. · DOI
  17. Wu JR, Moser DK, Chung ML, Lennie TA. Objectively measured, but not self-reported, medication adherence independently predicts event-free survival in patients with heart failure. J Card Fail. 2008;14(3):203–10. · DOI
  18. Quinlan PJ, Earnest G, Eisner MD, Yelin EH, Katz PP, Balmes JR, et al. Performance of self-reported occupational exposure compared to a job-exposure matrix approach in asthma and chronic rhinitis. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(3):154–60. · DOI
  19. Bender B, Milgrom H, Rand C. Nonadherence in asthmatic patients: is there a solution to the problem? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997;79:177–85. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Møldrup, C., Stein, J., & Søndergaard, B.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Møldrup, Claus
Venue
Pharmacy World & Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-10-06
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
795-798
ISSN
  • 0167-6555 (ISSN-L)
  • 0928-1231
  • 1573-739X
DOI
10.1007/s11096-010-9439-0
OpenAlex
W2091890629
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Pharmacy World & Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
asthma, medication adherence, SMS monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Asthma, Denmark, Female, Humans, Deception, Male, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review