Cited by 172Medication Adherence and CompliancePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePharmacy and Medical Practices

Adherence: a concept analysis

Bissonnette, Janice M.·2008·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Title. Adherence: a concept analysis. Aim. This paper is a report of an analysis of the concept of adherence. Background. The transition in terminology from compliance to adherence, and more recently to concordance, requires re‐clarification of ‘adherence’ as a concept in nursing practice. Differences exist in the use of the term adherence and how or if it differs from compliance or concordance. Data sources. Using the Medical Subject Headings terms adherence, non‐adherence and treatment refusal, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, PsychINFO and Cochrane library databases were searched for publications between 1970 and 2007. Method. The evolutionary analytic method was used to identify and explore transitions in the concept of adherence over time and across healthcare disciplines. A representative sample of papers was identified from the disciplines of nursing, medicine, psychology and pharmacy. Results. We identified 114 papers: 27 from nursing, 39 from psychology, 33 from general medicine and 15 from pharmacology sources. The final sample included eight from pharmacy and 15 from mental health, medicine and nursing. We found no distinct differentiation between adherence and compliance. The surrogate terms serving as manifestations of adherence are concordance, agreement, cooperation and partnership. The most common definition found was as follows: ‘Adherence can be defined as the extent to which patients follow the instructions they are given for prescribed treatments’. No definition of adherence exists that reflects a patient‐centred approach, the dynamic nature of adherence behaviour and the power imbalance implied by these terms. Conclusion. This concept analysis of adherence is a preliminary step towards broadening nurses’ appreciation of the complexity of patient adherence behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04745.x

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nieuwlaat and colleagues' review found that the most effective adherence interventions were more complex and multi-faceted, providing tailored, personal, continuous education, counseling, and daily support from health professionals and family.

    “Nieuwlaat and colleagues' literature review (2014)35 found that the most effective adherence interventions were more complex and multi-faceted (e.g., delivering education materials via both peers and nurses) and provided tailored, personal, and continuous education, counseling, and daily treatment support from health professionals (e.g., pharmacists) and supplemental support from family.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bissonnette, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Bissonnette, Janice M.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
634-643
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2109433530
Cited by
172
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, non-compliance, treatment refusal, compliance, concordance, patient-centered care, nursing terminology
MeSH terms
Attitude, Concept Formation, Humans, Patient Compliance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review