The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long-term drought stress
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the molecular basis of plant performance under water-limiting conditions will help to breed crop plants with a lower water demand. We investigated the physiological and gene expression response of drought-tolerant (IR57311 and LC-93-4) and drought-sensitive (Nipponbare and Taipei 309) rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars to 18 days of drought stress in climate chamber experiments. Drought stressed plants grew significantly slower than the controls. Gene expression profiles were measured in leaf samples with the 20 K NSF oligonucleotide microarray. A linear model was fitted to the data to identify genes that were significantly regulated under drought stress. In all drought stressed cultivars, 245 genes were significantly repressed and 413 genes induced. Genes differing in their expression pattern under drought stress between tolerant and sensitive cultivars were identified by the genotype x environment (G x E) interaction term. More genes were significantly drought regulated in the sensitive than in the tolerant cultivars. Localizing all expressed genes on the rice genome map, we checked which genes with a significant G x E interaction co-localized with published quantitative trait loci regions for drought tolerance. These genes are more likely to be important for drought tolerance in an agricultural environment. To identify the metabolic processes with a significant G x E effect, we adapted the analysis software MapMan for rice. We found a drought stress induced shift toward senescence related degradation processes that was more pronounced in the sensitive than in the tolerant cultivars. In spite of higher growth rates and water use, more photosynthesis related genes were down-regulated in the tolerant than in the sensitive cultivars.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data
Smyth, G. K. (2005) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/0-387-29362-0_23 · Cited by 5,796
Cited by
Plant molecular stress responses face climate change
Ahuja, I., de Vos, R. C. H., Bones, A. M., & Hall, R. D. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.002 · Cited by 1,040
Genetic Engineering and Breeding of Drought-Resistant Crops
Hu, H., & Xiong, L. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040000 · Cited by 783
Potassium Control of Plant Functions: Ecological and Agricultural Implications
Sardans, J., & Peñuelas, J. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10020419 · Cited by 621
Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era
Tuberosa, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00347 · Cited by 558
Role of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes in Plant Stress Response
Pandian, B. A., Sathishraj, R., Djanaguiraman, M., Prasad, P. V. V., & Jugulam, M. (2020) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox9050454 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Degenkolbe, T., Do, P. T., Zuther, E., Repsilber, D., Walther, D., Hincha, D. K., & Köhl, K. I.
- Venue
- Plant Molecular Biology
- Published
- 2008-10-19
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 133-153
- ISSN
- 0167-4412 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5028
- OpenAlex
- W2116530161
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long-term drought stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11103-008-9412-7
- The paper
- Degenkolbe, T., Do, P. T., Zuther, E., Repsilber, D., Walther, D., Hincha, D. K., & Köhl, K. I. (2009). Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long-term drought stress. Plant Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-008-9412-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.