Cited by 5,796Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data

Smyth, G. K.·2005·Statistics for Biology and Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/0-387-29362-0_23

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smyth, G. K.
Corresponding author
Smyth, G. K.
Venue
Statistics for Biology and Health
Published
2005-12-29
Pages
397-420
OpenAlex
W1546952499
Cited by
5,796
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 177 · 2023: 212 · 2022: 258 · 2021: 316 · 2020: 329 · 2019: 270 · 2018: 266 · 2017: 356 · 2016: 387 · 2015: 559 · 2014: 529 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 365
FWCI
195.35
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
limma, differential gene expression, microarray data, linear models, empirical Bayes, factorial design, time-course experiments, biological replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review