The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The significance of magnesium for crop quality
Open accessAbstract
Background The quality of agricultural and horticultural products and its modulation by fertilization has increasingly received attention. However, whereas the importance of magnesium (Mg) as an essential plant nutrient is well established, the impact of Mg nutrition on quality parameters has only been rarely addressed. Scope This review aims at evaluating the available knowledge on the influence of Mg on produce quality. A short discussion on the term quality as used in this review is followed by an overview of the various functions of Mg in plant metabolism in relation to quality aspects. Finally, the available literature on Mg-associated effects on crop quality is critically surveyed. The question whether Mg application beyond yield optimum further improves crop quality is specifically addressed. Conclusion Increasing Mg supply on Mg-deficient sites tends to increase the quality of agricultural crops, particularly when the formation of quality traits is dependent on Mg-driven photosynthesis and assimilate translocation within the plant. In fruits and vegetables, ratios of Mg to other nutrients like Ca and K were shown to be a more reliable indicator of the quality response than the Mg status alone. Moreover, it is concluded that Mg doses beyond those required for maximum yield rarely induce a further improvement of produce quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Organization for Standardization
(2015) · Encyclopedia of Astrobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44185-5_100574 · Cited by 6,716
ASCORBATE AND GLUTATHIONE: Keeping Active Oxygen Under Control
Noctor, G., & Foyer, C. H. (1998) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249 · Cited by 5,698
Acrylamide is formed in the Maillard reaction
Mottram, D. S., Wedzicha, B. L., & Dodson, A. T. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/419448a · Cited by 2,267
White, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x · Cited by 2,178
Schlemmer, U., Frølich, W., Prieto, R. M., & Grases, F. (2009) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200900099 · Cited by 903
Magnesium transport and function in plants: the tip of the iceberg
Shaul, O. (2002) · Biometals · doi:10.1023/a:1016091118585 · Cited by 632
Gibson, R. S., Bailey, K. B., Gibbs, M., & Ferguson, E. L. (2010) · Food and Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1177/15648265100312s206 · Cited by 556
Gransee, A., & Führs, H. (2013) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1567-y · Cited by 554
Self-citationRole of magnesium in carbon partitioning and alleviating photooxidative damage
Cakmak, I., & Kirkby, E. A. (2008) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01042.x · Cited by 550
Cakmak, I., Hengeler, C., & Marschner, H. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/45.9.1245 · Cited by 457
Cited by
Magnesium deficiency in plants: An urgent problem
Guo, W., Nazim, H., Liang, Z., & Yang, D. (2016) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2015.11.003 · Cited by 572
Apple fruit quality: Overview on pre-harvest factors
Musacchi, S., & Serra, S. (2018) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.057 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerendás, J., & Führs, H.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2013-01-09
- Volume
- 368
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 101-128
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2078639373
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The significance of magnesium for crop quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11104-012-1555-2
- The paper
- Gerendás, J., & Führs, H. (2013). The significance of magnesium for crop quality. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1555-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.