Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ideological polarization of political parties increases partisanship.
“Firstly, ideological polarization of political parties was shown to increase partisanship (Iyengar et al., 2012;Lupu, 2015)”
From Political polarization and corruption: A theoretical and empirical review (2024) · cites this paper as Lupu, 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 132 · Cited by 312
- Authors
- Lupu, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lupu, Noam
- ORCID
- Lupu, Noam
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2014-06-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 331-356
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W1999057994
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 73.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- partisan polarization, party attachment, vote choice, cross-national comparison, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
