Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Partisanship has bled into the nonpolitical sphere, driving ordinary citizens to reward copartisans and penalize opposing partisans.
“This work consistently shows that partisanship has bled into the nonpolitical sphere, driving ordinary citizens to reward copartisans and penalize opposing partisans, a point to which we return below.”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Gift & Gift 2015
In the Democratic county, Democratic resumes were 2.4 percentage points more likely to receive a callback than Republican resumes; in the Republican county, the partisan preference for Republican resumes was 5.6 percentage points.
“They find that in the Democratic county, Democratic resumes were 2.4 percentage points more likely to receive a callback than Republican resumes; the partisan preference for Republican resumes in the Republican county was 5.6 percentage points.”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Gift & Gift (2015)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 293
- Authors
- Gift, K., & Gift, T.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gift, Thomas
- ORCID
- Gift, Thomas
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2014-09-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653-675
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W2001420697
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-08-11)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Washington and Lee University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- political signaling, curriculum vitae, hiring discrimination, partisan affiliation, employer preferences, partisanship, job seekers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
