Global versus intercultural citizenship education
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pedagogical approach of intercultural cooperation enriches education for global citizenship by promoting dialogue and interaction between students from diverse backgrounds and cultural worldviews, overcoming ethnocentric and nationalistic conceptions.
“The pedagogical approach of intercultural cooperation enriches education for global citizenship by promoting dialogue and interaction between students from diverse backgrounds and cultural worldviews, by overcoming ethnocentric and nationalistic conceptions (Portera, 2023).”
From Civic education in a new post-democratic context: The need to revitalize a dialogic and cooperative pedagogy for global citizenship (2025) · cites this paper as Portera, 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gozálvez, V., & Calandín, J. G. (2025) · PROSPECTS · doi:10.1007/s11125-025-09741-z · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Portera, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Portera, Agostino
- ORCID
- Portera, Agostino
- Venue
- PROSPECTS
- Published
- 2021-12-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 233-248
- ISSN
- 0033-1538 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-9090
- OpenAlex
- W3214975558
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Prospects (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Immigration and Intercultural Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Citizenship Education and Democracy
- Keywords
- global citizenship education, intercultural citizenship education, intercultural competence, multiple identities, nation-state, UNESCO, neoliberalism, Eurocentrism, citizenship education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
