Global citizenship education in a space of “flow”
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The demographic and cultural flow in the world should be regarded as offering a valuable pedagogical instrument towards promoting a Freirean dialogue.
“According to these authors, the demographic and cultural flow in the world should be regarded as offering a valuable pedagogical instrument towards promoting a Freirean dialogue about this relationship.”
From Civic education in a new post-democratic context: The need to revitalize a dialogic and cooperative pedagogy for global citizenship (2025) · cites this paper as Van der Walt & Wolhuter, 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gozálvez, V., & Calandín, J. G. (2025) · PROSPECTS · doi:10.1007/s11125-025-09741-z · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- van der Walt, J. L., & Wolhuter, C. C.
- Affiliations
- North-West University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Wolhuter, Charl C.
- Venue
- PROSPECTS
- Published
- 2021-11-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 249-264
- ISSN
- 0033-1538 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-9090
- OpenAlex
- W3213688131
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Prospects (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
- Social Sciences › Education › Citizenship Education and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peace and Human Rights Education
- Keywords
- global citizenship education, globalization, space of flows, citizenship education, glocalization, xenophobia, discrimination, social mobility, migration, curriculum development, critical citizenship, global justice, permanence and change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
