Cited by 26Mental Health Treatment and AccessPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPsychiatric care and mental health services

Providing Mental Health Services in the Primary Care Setting: the Experiences and Perceptions of General Practitioners at a New York City Clinic

Bagayogo, Issa Papiss, Turcios-Wiswe, Katharina, Taku, Kanako, Peccoralo, Lauren, Katz, Craig L.·2018·Psychiatric Quarterly

Abstract

Mental illness is a significant cause of disability worldwide, including here in the United States. Given the shortage of trained mental health professionals, a significant portion of patients needing care are managed in the primary care setting. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), for example, are seeking to improve the quality of care for this vulnerable population, but many are facing significant challenges relating to integration of new services. We sought to elucidate barriers faced by primary care practitioners (PCPs)-physicians, physician trainees and nurse practitioners-at a New York primary care clinic, which impede delivery of optimal care to those suffering from mental illness. The study was conducted with 32 PCPs in 2016-2017 at Mount Sinai Internal Medicine Associates in New York City. For the quantitative component of the study, a 54-item questionnaire was devised to assess their attitude, behavior and confidence in managing psychiatric patients. For the qualitative component, data was obtained from 3 open-ended questions. Responses were coded for salient themes. Analysis revealed a range of difficulties faced by PCPs. Overall, participants felt that the need to integrate mental health care into primary care was important, however they reported significant barriers in terms of lack of time, lack of resources, low confidence in treating more complex mental health conditions and difficulties with referring patient to mental health specialists. Despite a growing body of evidence that integration of mental health services in primary care leads to improved outcomes, addressing barriers to care will be key to ensuring feasibility of integration measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11126-018-9587-2

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bagayogo, I. P., Turcios-Wiswe, K., Taku, K., Peccoralo, L., & Katz, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Beth Israel (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Oakland University (US)
Corresponding author
Bagayogo, Issa Papiss
Venue
Psychiatric Quarterly
Published
2018-07-02
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
897-908
ISSN
  • 0033-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6709
OpenAlex
W2809853030
Cited by
26
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
mental health integration, primary care, general practitioners, barriers to care, physician attitudes, physician confidence, nurse practitioners, physician trainees, mental illness, accountable care organizations, New York City
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, New York City, Primary Health Care, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Young Adult, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review