Cited by 971COVID-19 and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

The effect of COVID-19 on youth mental health

Open access
Liang, Leilei, Ren, Hui, Cao, Ruilin, Hu, Yueyang, Qin, Zeying, Li, Chuanen, Mei, Songli·2020·Psychiatric Quarterly

Abstract

The purposes of this study was to assess the youth mental health after the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) occurred in China two weeks later, and to investigate factors of mental health among youth groups. A cross-sectional study was conducted two weeks after the occurrence of COVID-19 in China. A total of 584 youth enrolled in this study and completed the question about cognitive status of COVID-19, the General Health Questionnaire(GHQ-12), the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) and the Negative coping styles scale. Univariate analysis and univariate logistic regression were used to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 on youth mental health. The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that nearly 40.4% the sampled youth were found to be prone to psychological problems and 14.4% the sampled youth with Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Univariate logistic regression revealed that youth mental health was significantly related to being less educated (OR = 8.71, 95%CI:1.97–38.43), being the enterprise employee (OR = 2.36, 95%CI:1.09–5.09), suffering from the PTSD symptom (OR = 1.05, 95%CI:1.03–1.07) and using negative coping styles (OR = 1.03, 95%CI:1.00–1.07). Results of this study suggest that nearly 40.4% of the youth group had a tendency to have psychological problems. Thus, this was a remarkable evidence that infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, may have an immense influence on youth mental health. Therefor, local governments should develop effective psychological interventions for youth groups, moreover, it is important to consider the educational level and occupation of the youth during the interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11126-020-09744-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Buzzi et al. (2020) did not test the reliability and validity of their instruments, and some researchers did not consider other variables including confounders.

    “Buzzi et al. (2020) did not test the reliability and validity of their instruments, and some researchers did not take into consideration other variables, inclusive of the confounders [26,31,32,34].”

    From Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Limitations and Future Research Directions section says that other variables affecting youth mental health should be examined, and Data Analyses describes univariate logistic regression. This supports the point about variables not considered, but the paper does not specifically identify omitted confounders. The statement about Buzzi et al. is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Depression and anxiety were higher among children and adolescents in other pandemics, and specifically COVID-19.

    “Depression and anxiety were higher among children and adolescents in other pandemics, and specifically COVID‑19 [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].”

    From Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says earlier epidemics were associated with depression and anxiety in the public, and the Discussion (page unavailable) reports psychological problems among youth shortly after COVID-19. The study did not report separate depression or anxiety outcomes; its participants were aged 14–35, mostly 21–30, so it does not establish that those conditions were higher specifically among children and adolescents. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the emotional and behavioral experience of children and adolescents.

    “on the COVID‑19 pandemic reported that the current pandemic has significantly affected the emotional and behavioral experience of children and adolescents [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].”

    From Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Abstract reports psychological problems and PTSD symptoms among surveyed youth after COVID-19, supporting an effect on emotional well-being. But the Participants and Participant Characteristics sections show that the sample was aged 14–35, mostly 21–30; the paper does not establish effects on children broadly or assess their behavioral experience. Its Limitations section also cautions that the cross-sectional design cannot provide strong evidence of causality. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder is significantly related to mental health of adolescents and youths (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07).

    “Liang et al.’s (2020) cross-sectional survey showed that the mental health of adolescents and youths is significantly related to being less educated (OR: = 8.71, 95%, CI: 1.97–38.43), the use of negative coping styles (OR: = 1.03, 95%, CI: 1.00–1.07), suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (OR: = 1.05, 95%, CI: 1.03–1.07), and working as an employee (OR: = 2.36, 95%, CI: 1.09–5.09).”

    From Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Liang et al. (2020)

    The Univariate Logistic section reports an association between PTSD symptoms and psychological disorders in the surveyed youth, with OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03–1.07). The source measures PTSD symptoms, not a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder, so the claim overstates that part of the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pandemics have a significant impact on the mental health of children and adolescents.

    “Our findings from this current review shed light on the significant impact of pandemics on the mental health of children and adolescents.”

    From Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Abstract and Discussion report substantial psychological problems among youth during the COVID-19 outbreak. But the Participant Characteristics section says participants were aged 14–35, with most aged 21–30. The study therefore supports an impact on youth, but does not establish the claim specifically for children and adolescents or for pandemics generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 971

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [16]16. Xie YN. The initial exploration of reliability and validity of simplified coping styles questionnaire. Chin J Clin Psych. 1998;6:114-5.
  2. [24]24. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Husha JA, Keane TM. The PTSD checklist: reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Int Soc Trauma Stress Stud. 1993;2:90-2.
  3. [38]38. Peng EYC, Lee MB, Tsai ST, Yang CC, Morisky DE, Tsai LT, et al. Population-based post-crisis psychological distress: an example from the SARS outbreak in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010;109: 524-32.

Authors
Liang, L., Ren, H., Cao, R., Hu, Y., Qin, Z., Li, C., & Mei, S.
Affiliations
Jilin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Mei, Songli
Venue
Psychiatric Quarterly
Published
2020-04-21
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
841-852
ISSN
  • 0033-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6709
OpenAlex
W3017093464
Cited by
971
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 184 · 2022: 256 · 2021: 270 · 2020: 107
FWCI
81.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International innovation team of Jilin University (2019GJTD06)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, youth mental health, post-traumatic stress disorder, mental illness, negative coping, educational attainment, employment status, psychological intervention, China
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Educational Status, Employment, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health, Pneumonia, Viral, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Logistic Models, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review