Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patterns of online ideological segregation resemble offline patterns of media consumption, and most social media users are exposed to reasonable levels of ideological heterogeneity.
“patterns of online ideological segregation resemble offline patterns of media consumption205, and most social media users are exposed to reasonable levels of ideological heterogeneity206,207,257,266–268.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [266]
Politically active web users tend to organize into insular, homogenous communities segregated along partisan lines.
“Despite this, some empirical evidence suggests that politically active web users tend to organize into insular, homogenous communities segregated along partisan lines.”
From Political Polarization on Twitter (2021) · cites this paper as Hargittai, Gallo, and Kane (2007)
Political blogs preferentially link to other blogs of the same political ideology.
“Adamic and Glance (2005) famously demonstrated that political blogs preferentially link to other blogs of the same political ideology, a finding supported by the work of Hargittai, Gallo, and Kane (2007).”
From Political Polarization on Twitter (2021) · cites this paper as Hargittai, Gallo, and Kane (2007)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 246
- Authors
- Hargittai, E., Gallo, J., & Kane, M.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hargittai, Eszter
- Venue
- Public Choice
- Published
- 2007-08-10
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 67-86
- ISSN
- 0048-5829 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7101
- OpenAlex
- W2106998516
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 33.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Public Choice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Northwestern University
- Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- political blogs, ideological polarization, ideological echo chambers, link analysis, straw man argument, online political discourse, dissenting opinions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
