The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Superconducting phase qubits
Open accessAbstract
Experimental progress is reviewed for superconducting phase qubit research at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The phase qubit has a potential advantage of scalability, based on the low impedance of the device and the ability to microfabricate complex “quantum integrated circuits”. Single and coupled qubit experiments, including qubits coupled to resonators, are reviewed along with a discussion of the strategy leading to these experiments. All currently known sources of qubit decoherence are summarized, including energy decay (T 1), dephasing (T 2), and measurement errors. A detailed description is given for our fabrication process and control electronics, which is directly scalable. With the demonstration of the basic operations needed for quantum computation, more complex algorithms are now within reach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Prolate Spheroidal Wave Functions, Fourier Analysis and Uncertainty - I
Slepian, D., & Pollak, H. O. (1961) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1961.tb03976.x · Cited by 2,492
Decoherence in Josephson Qubits from Dielectric Loss
Martinis, J. M., Cooper, K. B., McDermott, R., Steffen, M., Ansmann, M., Osborn, K. D., Cicak, K., Oh, S., Pappas, D. P., Simmonds, R. W., et al. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210503 · Cited by 838
Self-citationMacroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement
Leggett, A. J. (1980) · Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement · doi:10.1143/ptps.69.80 · Cited by 674
Devoret, M. H., Martinis, J. M., & Clarke, J. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.1908 · Cited by 454 · cited 1×
“Initial experiments verified quantum behavior via the phenomenon of tunneling out of the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson junction [7].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook
Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231930 · Cited by 2,114
Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits
Gu, X., Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liu, Y.-X., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002 · Cited by 1,307
Towards understanding two-level-systems in amorphous solids: insights from quantum circuits
Müller, C., Cole, J. H., & Lisenfeld, J. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab3a7e · Cited by 508
Violation of Bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits
Ansmann, M., Wang, H., Bialczak, R. C., Hofheinz, M., Lucero, E., Neeley, M., O'Connell, A. D., Sank, D., Weides, M., Wenner, J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08363 · Cited by 441
Self-citationAnalytic control methods for high-fidelity unitary operations in a weakly nonlinear oscillator
Gambetta, J. M., Motzoi, F., Merkel, S. T., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.012308 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinis, J. M.
- Venue
- Quantum Information Processing
- Published
- 2009-02-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 81-103
- ISSN
- 1570-0755 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1332
- OpenAlex
- W2147295461
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 23.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Superconducting phase qubits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11128-009-0105-1
- The paper
- Martinis, J. M. (2009). Superconducting phase qubits. Quantum Information Processing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-009-0105-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
