Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 133Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsPosthumanist Ethics and Activism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Power, Positionality, and the Ethic of Care in Qualitative Research

Reich, Jennifer A.·2021·Qualitative Sociology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11133-021-09500-4

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stuart, Forrest. 2017. Introspection, positionality, and the self as research instrument toward a model of abductive reflexivity. In Approaches to ethnography: Analysis and representation in participant observations, eds. Colin Jerolmack and Shamus Khan, 211–237. New York: Oxford University Press.

Metadata

Authors
Reich, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Reich, Jennifer A.
Venue
Qualitative Sociology
Published
2021-10-30
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
575-581
ISSN
  • 0162-0436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7837
OpenAlex
W3208999264
Cited by
133
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 7
FWCI
22.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Qualitative Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
positionality, power in research, care ethics, reflexivity, qualitative research methodology, researcher positionality, co-construction of knowledge, situated knowledge, researcher-subject relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power, Positionality, and the Ethic of Care in Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11133-021-09500-4
The paper
Reich, J. A. (2021). Power, Positionality, and the Ethic of Care in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09500-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.