The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology
Open accessAbstract
Feminists have made important contributions to sociology, but we have yet to transform the basic conceptual frameworks of the field. A comparison of sociology with anthropology, history, and literature–disciplines which have been more deeply transformed–suggests factors that may facilitate or inhibit feminist paradigm shifts. The traditional subject matter of sociology fell into a co-optable middle ground, neither as thoroughly male centered as in history or literature, nor as deeply gendered as in anthropology. In addition, feminist perspectives have been contained in sociology by functionalist conceptualizations of gender, by the inclusion of gender as a variable rather than as a theoretical category, and by being ghettoized, especially in Marxist sociology. Feminist rethinking is also affected by underlying epistemologies (proceeding more rapidly in fields based on interpretive rather than positivist understanding), and by the status and nature of theory within a discipline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
New Categories Are Not Enough: Rethinking the Measurement of Sex and Gender in Social Surveys
Westbrook, L., & Saperstein, A. (2015) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243215584758 · Cited by 434
MESSNER, M. A. (1998) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243298012003002 · Cited by 217
Scaling Up: Representing Gender Diversity in Survey Research
Magliozzi, D., Saperstein, A., & Westbrook, L. (2016) · Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023116664352 · Cited by 146
Power, Positionality, and the Ethic of Care in Qualitative Research
Reich, J. A. (2021) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/s11133-021-09500-4 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Stacey, J., & Thorne, B.
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 301-316
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2158951947
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/sp.1985.32.4.03a00010
- The paper
- Stacey, J., & Thorne, B. (1985). The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1985.32.4.03a00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.