The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Action Research is Similar to Design Science
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707 · cited 8×
“Hevner et al. (2004) market and “inform the community of IS researchers and practitioners of how to conduct, evaluate, and present design science research.”
BackgroundInfluentialDesign science in information systems research
(2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017212.2017217 · Cited by 8,254
Diversity in information systems action research methods
Baskerville, R., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1998) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000298 · Cited by 689
Cited by
A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240302 · Cited by 7,832
(2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 1,638
Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research
Goldkuhl, G. (2012) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.54 · Cited by 541
Costa, E., Soares, A. L., & de Sousa, J. P. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102070 · Cited by 100
(2011) · DiVA (Linkoping University) · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Järvinen, P.
- Venue
- Quality & Quantity
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-54
- ISSN
- 0033-5177 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7845
- OpenAlex
- W1993373830
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
