Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,705

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A typology of mixed methods research designs

Leech, Nancy L., Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.·2009·Quality & Quantity
DOI 10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Bos J., Huston A.C., Granger R., Duncan G., Brock T., McLoyd W.C. (1999). New Hope for People with Low Incomes: Two-year Results of a Program to Reduce Poverty and Reform Welfare. Manpower Research Demonstration Corporation, New York
  2. Collins K.M.T. (2000, October). Implementing mathematics curricula standards: Effective instruction for “all” students?. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the mid-western Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL
  3. Creswell J.W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  4. Creswell J.W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ
  5. Currall S.C., Towler A.J. (2003). Research methods in management and organizational research: toward integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 513–526. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  6. Daley C.E., Onwuegbuzie A.J. (2004). Attributions toward violence of male juvenile delinquents: a concurrent mixed methods analysis. J. Soc. Psychol. 144: 549–570 · DOI
  7. Dzurec L.C., Abraham J.L. (1993). The nature of inquiry: linking quantitative and qualitative research. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 16: 73–79 · DOI
  8. Forthofer M.S. (2003). Status of mixed methods in the health sciences. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 527–540. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  9. Greene J.C., Caracelli V.J.: Advances in Mixed-Method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation, NO. 74). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1997) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hayter M. (1999). Burnout and AIDS care-related factors in HIV community clinical nurse specialists in the north of England. J. Adv. Nurs. 29: 984–993 · DOI
  11. Hunter A., Brewer J. (2003). Multimethod research in sociology. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp 577–594. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  12. Maxwell J.A., Loomis D.M. (2003). Mixed methods design: an alternative approach. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp 241–272. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  13. McMillan J.H., Schumacher S. (2001). Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction, 5th edn. Longman, New York, NY
  14. Morgan D.L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual. Health Res. 3: 362–376 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Morse J.M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs. Res. 40: 120–123 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Morse J.M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp 189–208. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  17. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Daniel L.G., eds. (2006) Special issue on mixed methods research [Special issue]. Res. Schools 13(1): 1–99
  18. Onwuegbuzie A.J., DaRos-Voseles D.A. (2001). The role of cooperative learning in research methodology courses: a mixed-methods analysis. Res. Schools 8: 61–75
  19. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Jiao Q.G., Bostick S.L. (2004). Library Anxiety: Theory, Research, and Applications. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD
  20. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Johnson R.B. (2004). Mixed method and mixed model research. In: Johnson, R.B., Christensen, L.B. (eds) Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches., pp 408–431. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA
  21. Patton M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
  22. Rallis S.F., Rossman G.B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation context: a pragmatic framework. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 491–512. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  23. Rocco T.S., Bliss L.A., Gallagher S., Perez-Prado A., Alacaci C., Dwyer E.S., Fine J.C., Pappamihiel N.E. (2003). The pragmatic and dialectical lenses: two views of mixed methods use in education. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 595–615. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  24. Sandelowski M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers don’t count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Res. Nurs. Health 24: 230–240 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Senne T.A., Rikard G.L. (2002). Experiencing the portfolio process during the internship: a comparative analysis of two PETE portfolio models. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 21: 309–336 · doi:10.1123/jtpe.21.3.309
  26. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 46. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  27. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C., eds. (2003a). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  28. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (2003b). The past and future of mixed methods research: from data triangulation to mixed model designs. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 671–701. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  29. Taylor D.L., Tashakkori A. (1997). Toward an understanding of teachers’ desire for participation in decision making. J. School Leadership 7: 1–20 · DOI
  30. Teddlie C., Tashakkori A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 3–50. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  31. Twinn S. (2003). Status of mixed methods research in nursing. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 541–556. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  32. Waszak C., Sines M.C. (2003). Mixed methods in psychological research. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 557–576. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  33. Waysman M., Savaya R. (1997). Mixed method evaluation: a case study. Eval. Pract. 18: 227–237 · DOI
  34. Weisner T. (2000). Understanding better the lives of poor families: ethnographic and survey studies in the New Hope experiment. Poverty Res. News 4(1): 10–12

Cited by

See all 1,705

Metadata

Authors
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J.
Venue
Quality & Quantity
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-03-27
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
265-275
ISSN
  • 0033-5177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7845
DOI
10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
OpenAlex
W2142284804
Cited by
1,705
References
4
FWCI
66.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A typology of mixed methods research designs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
The paper
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.