The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we extend the guidelines of Venkatesh et al. (2013) for mixed-methods research by identifying and integrating variations in mixed-methods research. By considering 14 properties of mixed-methods research (e.g., purposes, research questions, epistemological assumptions), our guidelines demonstrate how researchers can flexibly identify the existing variations in mixed-methods research and proceed accordingly with a study design that suits their needs. To make the guidelines actionable for various situations and issues that researchers could encounter, we develop a decision tree to map the flow and relationship among the design strategies. We also illustrate one possible type of mixed-methods research in information systems in depth and discuss how to develop and validate meta-inferences as the outcomes of such a study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Robinson, P. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x · Cited by 23,258
Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202 · Cited by 21,631
(1998) · Cited by 18,576
(1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 18,397
(1994) · Cited by 13,126
(1996) · Cited by 11,584
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170 · cited 7×
“Therefore, researchers can use the strengths of one method to overcome the weaknesses of another method by using both in a research study (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWeber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 4×
“Triangulation techniques: 1) allow researchers to be more confident in their results, 2) can stimulate the creation of inventive methods and new ways of understanding a problem from multiple perspectives, 3) may help uncover various dimensions of a phenomenon, and (4) can lead to a synthesis or integration of theories…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103590 · Cited by 537
Cheng, X., Zhang, X., Cohen, J., & Mou, J. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102940 · Cited by 536
AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225 · Cited by 368
Hou, F., Guan, Z., Li, B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2019) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-04-2018-0177 · Cited by 366
Chandra, S., Shirish, A., & Srivastava, S. C. (2022) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2022.2127441 · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Authors
- University of Arkansas, Venkatesh, V., Brown, S., University of Arizona, Sullivan, Y., & State University of New York, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 435-494
- ISSN
- 1536-9323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2519107635
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17705/1jais.00433
- The paper
- University of Arkansas, Venkatesh, V., Brown, S., University of Arizona, Sullivan, Y., & State University of New York, B. (2016). Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00433
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
