Cited by 242Aging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomesHealth and Well-being Studies

Loneliness and health-related quality of life for the empty nest elderly in the rural area of a mountainous county in China

Liu, Li-Juan, Guo, Qiang·2007·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Objective To estimate whether loneliness was associated with quality of life and examined the influence of socio-economic factors in the empty nest elderly.Methods The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) were used to assess the quality of life and loneliness for 275 empty nest and 315 not empty nest rural elders in a county, China. T tests, Pearson's correlations and linear regression analysis were used to examine the difference in SF-36 and UCLA-LS scores, correlations of the two scores between the two groups, and socio-economic determinants of loneliness among the empty nest elders.Results Empty nest group, in comparison with not empty nest group, had higher level of loneliness (95% confidence interval [CI] = -3.361 to -.335), lower physical (95% CI = .228 to 6.044) and mental (95% CI = .866 to 6.380) scores. Loneliness was negatively correlated with all the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey scales in both groups. Social supports and income were negatively associated with loneliness, whereas education level and being single were positively associated with loneliness for the empty nest group.Conclusions Reducing the level of loneliness may be helpful to improve the quality of life for the empty nest elders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-007-9250-0

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L.-J., & Guo, Q.
Affiliations
Second Military Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Qiang
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2007-08-17
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1275-1280
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W1982635562
Cited by
242
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
loneliness, empty nest elderly, health-related quality of life, rural elderly, social support, income, educational attainment, marital status, socio-economic determinants, mountainous counties
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, China, Family Relations, Female, Geography, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Rural Population, Social Isolation, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review