Cited by 132Health and Well-being StudiesHealth and Lifestyle StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Factors associated with health-related quality of life among belgrade university students

Pekmezovic, Tatjana, Popovic, Aleksandra, Kisic Tepavcevic, Darija, Gazibara, Tatjana, Paunic, Mila·2011·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Purpose The aims of the study were to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among students of University of Belgrade (Serbia) and to identify factors that might have associated with their HRQoL including relationship with depression.Methods Between April and June, 2009, 1624 students were enrolled in the cross-sectional study. HRQoL was assessed by using SF-36 questionnaire and general depressive status by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). In statistical analysis, ANOVA (Bonferroni adjustment), χ(2) test, and correlation analysis were performed.Results In our study, the highest SF-36 scale score was obtained for Physical Functioning. All SF-36 domains significantly (P < 0.01) negatively correlated with BDI. Students of medical sciences had the lowest scores in almost all SF-36 domains. Students who lived with parents had statistically significantly higher scores of majority of SF-36 domains. The total SF-36 score significantly correlated with average monthly family income (P = 0.002). Smokers and non-smokers significantly differed in the total SF-36 score (P = 0.001). Based on the comparison across the physical activity categories, there is a clear pattern of differences in the total SF-36 scores (P = 0.001).Conclusion Our findings indicate that multiple factors are adversely associated with students' HRQoL. Appropriate health education programs to target modifiable risk factors may improve students' HRQoL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-010-9754-x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pekmezovic, T., Popovic, A., Kisic Tepavcevic, D., Gazibara, T., & Paunic, M.
Affiliations
University of Belgrade (RS)
Corresponding author
Pekmezovic, Tatjana
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2010-09-28
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
391-397
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2071305993
Cited by
132
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
health-related quality of life, university students, depression, physical function, household income, smoking, physical activity, living arrangements, medical students, modifiable risk factors, health education
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Students, Universities, Health Behavior, Serbia, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review